Role, Opportunities and Challenges of Collaboration and Interface Indian and Iranian Cinema

Kaveri Devi Mishra 1 * , Maryam Vaziri 2
More Detail
1 The Papua New Guinea University of Technology, PAPUA NEW GUINEA
2 Mysore University, INDIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 9, Issue 3, Article No: e201916.
OPEN ACCESS   1699 Views   1270 Downloads   Published online: 23 Jul 2019
Download Full Text (PDF)


This is an explanatory study based on library and secondary data about the cultural and artistic communication between countries of Iran and India in past and current status. India is an important trans-regional hub in cinema that has own culture and style which also influence other countries even on people life style or movies of different directors. In the other hand, Iran is a country with younger cinema industry which still has amount of good films and profession directors who are in touch with India and influence each other. They caused more interaction between these two great countries. Although the Iranian style of movies has different aspects from Indian, but beside of cultural and sociological impact, we cannot also deny the collaboration between directors and artists. The main question of this study is how we can use this cultural aspect in the future for the better communication between these two communities.


Mishra, K. D., & Vaziri, M. (2019). Role, Opportunities and Challenges of Collaboration and Interface Indian and Iranian Cinema. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(3), e201916.


  • Akter, T., & Dalkılıç, I. (2018). Aesthetic Pattern Forming of Ideological Messages in Turkish Cinema: Critical Analysis of ‘‘the Ottoman Republic ‘‘Movie. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(3), 165-180.
  • Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology compass, 3(2), 166-182.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, culture & society, 7(2-3), 295-310.
  • Chakravarty, S. S. (2007). Teaching Indian Cinema. Cinema Journal, 47(1), 105-108.
  • Chakravarty, S. S. (2011). National identity in Indian popular cinema, 1947-1987. University of Texas Press.
  • Corrigan, T., & White, P. (2012). The film experience: An introduction. Macmillan.
  • Deshpande, A. (2007). Indian cinema and the bourgeois nation state. Economic and Political Weekly, 95-103.
  • Deshpande, A. (2007). Indian cinema and the bourgeois nation state. Economic and Political Weekly, 95-103.
  • Esfandiary, S. (2011). Mehrjui’s Social Comedy and the Representation of the Nation in the Age of Globalization. Iranian Studies, 44(3), 341-358.
  • Gaut, B. (1998). Imagination, Interpretation, and Film, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
  • Grassilli, M. (2008) Migrant Cinema: Transnational and Guerrilla Practices of Film Production and Representation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(8), 1237-1255.
  • Grassilli, M. (2008). Migrant cinema: Transnational and guerrilla practices of film production and representation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(8), 1237-1255.
  • Gürkan, H., & Ozan, R. (2015). Feminist cinema as counter cinema: Is feminist cinema counter cinema?
  • Hansen, T. (2011). The Importance of Foreign Films in Intercultural Communication.
  • Iwabuchi, K. (2010). Globalization, East Asian media cultures and their publics. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 197-212.
  • Jenkins, H. (2004). The cultural logic of media convergence. International journal of cultural studies, 7(1), 33-43.
  • Kaur, R., & Sinha, A. J. (Eds.). (2005). Bollyworld: Popular Indian cinema through a transnational lens. SAGE Publications India.
  • Laachir, K., & Talajooy, S. (Eds.). (2013). Resistance in contemporary Middle Eastern cultures: Literature, cinema and music (Vol. 44). Routledge.
  • Lim, K. F. (2006). Transnational collaborations, local competitiveness: mapping the geographies of filmmaking in/through Hong Kong. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(3), 337-357.
  • Livingston, P., & Plantinga, C. (Eds.). (2008). The Routledge companion to philosophy and film. Routledge.
  • Mehta, R. B., & Pandharipande, R. V. (Eds.). (2011). Bollywood and globalization: Indian popular cinema, nation, and diaspora. Anthem Press.
  • Naficy, H. (2011). A Social History of Iranian Cinema, Volume 1: The Artisanal Era, 1897–1941 (Vol. 1). Duke University Press.
  • Nandy, A. (Ed.). (1998). The secret politics of our desires: innocence, culpability and Indian popular cinema. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Parr, H. (2007). Collaborative film-making as process, method and text in mental health research, Department of Geography, University of Dundee.
  • S. D. (2005). Sarkar: Re-presenting Amitabh Bachchan. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(38), 75-86. Retrieved on 15 January 2019 from
  • Semati, M. (2007). Living with globalization and the Islamic state: An introduction to media, culture, and society in Iran. In Media, culture and society in Iran (pp. 17-30). Routledge.
  • Seton, M. (1975). Problems of film making in Indi. India International Centre Quarterly, 2(2), 138-143.
  • Sharma, M. (2014). Transnational Cinema: A Cross Culture Communication Medium. J Mass Communicat Journalism, 4(219), 2.
  • Tapper, R. (Ed.). (2002). New Iranian Cinema: Politics, Representation and Identity. IB Tauris.
  • Tsivian, Y. (2008). “What Is Cinema?” An Agnostic Answer, Economic and Political Weekly.
  • White, J. (2003). Arguing with ethnography: the films of Bob Quinn and Pierre Perrault. Cinema Journal, 101-124.
  • White, P. (2015). Women’s Cinema, World Cinema: Projecting Contemporary Feminisms. Duke University Press.
  • Zeydabadi-Nejad, S. (2007). Iranian intellectuals and contact with the West: the case of Iranian cinema. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 34(3), 375-398.