Google Mini: Italian Example of Artificial Prosociality

Concetta Papapicco 1 *
More Detail
1 University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, ITALY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 10, Issue 3, Article No: e202015. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7995
OPEN ACCESS   1648 Views   901 Downloads   Published online: 22 Apr 2020
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Prosociality is a social and individual virtue, which evokes mixed feelings in the modern world. Generally, prosociality behavior is defined as “actions taken for the benefit of one or more other persons” (Wispe, 1972). The Digital Revolution and the birth of artificial intelligence, such as the Google Mini, allowed the transition from elitist experience to mass experience. The study has an exploratory function and starts from the Man-AI interaction, in a provocative and oppositional conversational context created by the Human Being. In the research, it is hypothesized, therefore, that the synthesis of the artificial voice does not allow to characterize all the facets of the tone and the emotionality of the prosociality. As a result, Artificial Intelligence is programmed to always respond in a “gentle” way, putting in place different facets of prosociality, which are well detected in the emotionality and prosodic analysis, above all in the recognition of “pitch” speech pattern. While emotional tone analysis confirms the “understanding” of reading the communicative context of Artificial Intelligence. Among future perspectives it is highlighted how the study of these vocal patterns of artificial prosociality can be a springboard for research on bullying, using the Google Mini Prosocial tool.
Keywords: artificial prosociality, Google Mini, vocal pattern recognition, OpenSMILE software, mixed method

CITATION

Papapicco, C. (2020). Google Mini: Italian Example of Artificial Prosociality. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202015. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7995

REFERENCES

  • Ballatt, J., & Campling, P. (2011). Intelligent kindness: Reforming the culture of healthcare. RCPsych publications.
  • Bonnefon, J.-F., Feeney, A., & Villejoubert, G. (2009). When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognition, 112(2), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005
  • Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 881-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00098-8
  • Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
  • De Caroli, M. E., & Sagone, E. (2013). Self-efficacy and prosocial tendencies in Italian adolescents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.666
  • De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
  • Eyben, F., Wöllmer, M., & Schuller, B. (2010). openSMILE - The Munich Versatile and Fast Open-Source Audio Feature Extractor. In Proc. ACM Multimedia (MM), ACM, Florence, Italy, ACM, pp. 1459-1462. https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1874246
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Readings in language and mind. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
  • Hinton, D. E., Ojserkis, R. A., Jalal, B., Peou, S., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Loving‐kindness in the treatment of traumatized refugees and minority groups: A typology of mindfulness and the nodal network model of affect and affect regulation. Journal of clinical psychology, 69(8), 817-828. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22017
  • Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011). Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical psychology review, 31(7), 1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.003
  • Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but... positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(2), 222-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970162006
  • Hopkins, J. (2001). Cultivating compassion: A Buddhist perspective. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
  • Hutcherson, C. A., Seppala, E. M., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. Emotion, 8(5), 720-724. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013237
  • Kaundinya, A. S., Atreyas, N. S., Srinivas, S., Kehav, V., & Kumar, N. M. R. (2017). Voice enabled home automation using amazon echo. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol, 4, 682-684.
  • Mascaro, J. S., Darcher, A., Negi, L. T., & Raison, C. L. (2015). The neural mediators of kindness-based meditation: a theoretical model. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00109
  • Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X205281
  • Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
  • Ortony, & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315
  • Panda, B., Padhi, D., Dash, K., & Mohantay, S. (2012). Use of SVM classifier & MFCC in Speech Emotion Recognition System. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering (IJARCSSE), 2(3).
  • Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
  • Passmore, J., & Oades, L. G. (2015). Positive psychology techniques: random acts of kindness and consistent acts of kindness and empathy. The Coaching Psychologist, 11(2), 90-92.
  • Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
  • Rowland, S. (2009). Kindness. London Review of Education, 7(3), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903290272
  • Utane, A. S., & Nalbalwar, S. L. (2013). Emotion Recognition through speech using Gaussian Mixture Model and Hidden Markov Model. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering (IJARCSSE), 3(4).
  • Wispe, L. G. (1972). Positive forms of social behavior: An overview. Journal of social issues, 28(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00029.x
  • Yoon, E. J., Tessler, M. H., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Talking with tact: Polite language as a balance between kindness and informativity. In Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2771-2776). Cognitive Science Society.