A corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist narratives on TikTok

Nicola Pelizzari 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Università di Brescia, Brescia, ITALY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 16, Issue 2, Article No: e202626. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/18491
OPEN ACCESS   44 Views   22 Downloads   Published online: 29 Apr 2026
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study investigates how glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are discursively constructed on TikTok through a corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis of 100 English-language videos tagged #glp1, comprising 137,032 words of transcribed speech and 254 minutes of content. Integrating keyword and collocation analysis, stance evaluation, MIPVU-based metaphor identification, and systematic multimodal annotation, the study examines dominant linguistic patterns, evaluative strategies, and semiotic resources shaping GLP-1 RA narratives. Results suggest a predominantly weight-normative and biomedical framing, with positive stance appearing prevalent across both verbal and non-verbal modes. Metaphorical framing appeared to center on four recurrent domains: transformation, struggle/battle, journey/progress, and cravings as noise, potentially reinforcing pharmacological intervention as simultaneously medical and personal. Multimodal features largely appeared to align with evaluative stance across semiotic layers, though descriptive patterns tentatively suggest variation by creator type. The study points to how TikTok’s communicative affordances may shape public understandings of pharmaceutical intervention, potentially privileging emotionally resonant narratives over clinically balanced discourse. It contributes to multimodal communication research by offering indicative evidence of how platform-specific semiotic resources may collaboratively shape health-related meaning-making, with possible implications for applied linguistics and digital health communication.

CITATION

Pelizzari, N. (2026). A corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist narratives on TikTok. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(2), e202626. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/18491

REFERENCES

  • AlSobeh, A., Franklin, A., Woodward, B., Porche’, M., & Siegelman, J. (2024). Unmasking media illusion: Analytical survey of deepfake video detection and emotional insights. Issues in Information Systems, 25(2), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2024_108
  • AlSobeh, A., Gwarzo, Z., & Shatnawi, A. (2025). ShadowPlay: Engineering defenses against role-based prompt injection and dependency hallucination in LLM-powered development. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Cybersecurity and AI-Based Systems (pp. 317-325). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Cyber-AI66431.2025.11233258
  • Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (version 3.5.8). Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/
  • Association of Internet Researchers. (2019, October 6). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
  • Basch, C. H., Narayanan, S., Tang, H., Fera, J., & Basch, C. E. (2023). Descriptive analysis of TikTok videos posted under the hashtag# Ozempic. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 1, Article 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100013
  • Bednarek, M. (2015). Corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis of television and film narratives. In P. Baker, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies. Palgrave advances in language and linguistics (pp. 63-87). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_4
  • Campos-Rivera, P. A., Alfaro-Ponce, B., Ramírez-Pérez, M., Bernal-Serrano, D., Contreras-Loya, D., & Wirtz, V. J. (2025). Quality of information and social norms in Spanish-speaking TikTok videos as levers of commercial practices: The case of semaglutide. Social Science & Medicine, 366, Article 117646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117646
  • Chakhtoura, M., Haber, R., Ghezzawi, M., Rhayem, C., Tcheroyan, R., & Mantzoros, C. S. (2023). Pharmacotherapy of obesity: An update on the available medications and drugs under investigation. eClinicalMedicine, 58, Article 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101882
  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1213-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x
  • Christiansen, A., Craythorne, S. L., Crawford, P., Larkin, M., Gohil, A., Strutt, S., & Page, R. (2025). Multimodal analysis of stories told by mental health influencers on TikTok. Health Expectations, 28(3), Article e70226. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70226
  • Coll-Florit, M., & Climent, S. (2022). Enemies or obstacles? Metaphors of war and journey in mental health discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 12(2), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.21035.col
  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stance taking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139-182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
  • Goldberg, D. S. (2014). Fatness, medicalization, and stigma: On the need to do better. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 4(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2014.0053
  • Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 216-225). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
  • Jensen, S. D., Gualano, B., Andreassen, P., Scagliusi, F. B., SturtzSreetharan, C., & Brewis, A. (2025). Beyond the prescription: Global observations on the social implications of GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. PLOS Global Public Health, 5(12), Article e0005516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005516
  • Keyser-Verreault, A. (2018). Aesthetic labour: Rethinking beauty politics in neoliberalism, edited by Ana Sofia Elias, Rosalind Gill, and Christina Scharff. Anthropologica, 60(2), 543-544. https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.2018-0049
  • Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The sketch engine. Lexicography, 1(1), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
  • Kim, S. J., Villanueva, I. I., & Chen, K. (2024). Going beyond affective polarization: How emotions and identities are used in anti-vaccination TikTok videos. Political Communication, 41(4), 588-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2243852
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
  • Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lennon, J. (2023). Can you stomach it? A content analysis of TikTok videos and comments about weight loss with Ozempic [Master’s thesis, University of Chicago]. https://doi.org/10.6082/uchicago.6092
  • Lupton, D. (2018). Digital health: Critical and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648835
  • Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036212933
  • Minadeo, M., & Pope, L. (2022). Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok—A qualitative content analysis. PLoS ONE, 17(11), Article e0267997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267997
  • Mordecai, C. (2023). #anxiety: A multimodal discourse analysis of narrations of anxiety on TikTok. Computers and Composition, 67, Article 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102763
  • Mozaffarian, D. (2024). GLP-1 agonists for obesity—A new recipe for success? JAMA, 331(12), 1007-1008. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.2252
  • Nogueiras, R., Nauck, M. A., & Tschöp, M. H. (2023). Gut hormone co-agonists for the treatment of obesity: From bench to bedside. Nature Metabolism, 5(6), 933-944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00812-z
  • Partington, A., Taylor, C., & Duguid, A. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55
  • Pearson, G., Davidson, D. L., Schillo, B., & Kreslake, J. M. (2025). ‘Discreet shipping’ on TikTok enables selling of e-cigarettes to youth. Tobacco Control, 34(2), 274-275. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058315
  • Pelizzari, N., Visconti, M., & Gelatti, U. (2026). Why do people trust (or mistrust) health organizations? A systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02819-w
  • Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., & Sutskever, I. (2022). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.04356
  • Raubenheimer, J. E., Myburgh, P. H., & Bhagavathula, A. S. (2024). Sweetening the deal: An infodemiological study of worldwide interest in semaglutide using Google Trends extended for health application programming interface. BMC Global and Public Health, 2(1), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00095-w
  • Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A., & Rayson, P. (2017). The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: A mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785
  • Somani, S., Jain, S. S., Sarraju, A., Sandhu, A. T., Hernandez-Boussard, T., & Rodriguez, F. (2024). Using large language models to assess public perceptions around glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on social media. Communications Medicine, 4, Article 137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00566-z
  • Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14
  • Swinburn, B. A., Kraak, V. I., Allender, S., Atkins, V. J., Baker, P. I., Bogard, J. R., Brinsden, H., Calvillo, A., De Schutter, O., Devarajan, R., Ezzati, M., Friel, S., Goenka, S., Hammond, R. A., Hastings, G., Hawkes, C., Herrero, M., Hovmand, P. S., Howden, M., ... Dietz, W. H. (2019). The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. The Lancet, 393(10173), 791-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8
  • Thomas, M. (2014). Evidence and circularity in multimodal discourse analysis. Visual Communication, 13(2), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357213516725
  • Van Poucke, M. (2023). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and shaming on TikTok: A multimodal appraisal analysis. Multimodality & Society, 3(2), 97-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231153955
  • Wall Street Journal. (2021). Inside TikTok’s algorithm: A WSJ video investigation. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/tiktok-algorithm-video-investigation-11626877477
  • Wilding, J. P., Batterham, R. L., Calanna, S., Davies, M., Van Gaal, L. F., Lingvay, I., McGowan, B. M., Rosenstock, J., Tran, M. T. D., Wadden, T. A., Wharton, S., Yokote, K., Zeuthen, N., & Kushner, R. F. (2021). Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 384(11), 989-1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
  • Williams Camus, J. T. (2009). Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 465-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609105220
  • Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1-14). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi116
  • Wright, J., & Harwood, V. (Eds.). (2009). Biopolitics and the ‘obesity epidemic’: Governing bodies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882061
  • Zhang, W., & Cheung, Y. L. (2022). The co-construction of news values on news magazine covers: A corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis (CAMDA). Journalism Studies, 23(15), 1917-1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2123845