Use of Modal Verbs as Stance Markers in Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials

Muhammad Ahmad 1 * , Muhammad Asim Mahmood 2, Muhammad Ilyas Mahmood 3, Ali Raza Siddique 4
More Detail
1 SSE English, Government High School, Hujra Shah Muqeem, Okara, PAKISTAN
2 Chairman Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, PAKISTAN
3 Head of English Department, University of Okara, Okara, PAKISTAN
4 Lecturer in English, Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, PAKISTAN
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 9, Issue 1, Article No: e201903.
OPEN ACCESS   3971 Views   3254 Downloads   Published online: 26 Feb 2019
Download Full Text (PDF)


This study investigates the use of modal verbs as stance markers in Pakistani English newspaper editorials. For this purpose, corpora of 1000 editorials have been developed from the editorials published in The News, The Dawn, The Frontier and The Express Tribune (250 editorials from each newspaper) and analyzed using AntConc Results reveal that prediction, possibility and necessity are the characteristic features of Pakistani English newspaper editorials and the writers of these editorials use modality to report, comment or inform about the state of affairs. Results also show that the main focus of Pakistani English newspapers’ editorials is on depicting ‘what will happen’, ‘what may happen’ and ‘what is needed to happen’. On the basis of these results, the study concludes that modality, being an important linguistic property, is used by the editorialists to maintain interaction with readers, establish authorial persona and present personal as well as institutional stance. To cipher readers’ negative perception about stance, the editorialists make a skillful use of intermediate-value modals. Study suggests the editorial readers to be aware of the writer’s stance marking. For, it may influence mind and manipulate opinions.


Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., Mahmood, M. I., & Siddique, A. R. (2019). Use of Modal Verbs as Stance Markers in Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(1), e201903.


  • Adams, H., & Quintana-Toledo, E. (2013). Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles. In Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 13-22). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
  • Biber, D. (2004). Historical patterns for the grammatical sarking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 5, 107-135.
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
  • Bista, K. (2009). On ‘yes, we can’: Linguistic power and possibility. Journal of English for Specific Purpose, 3(24), 34- 50.
  • Blazhevski, B. (2018). The selection of news in the international reporting of the Macedonian, Slovenian and Serbian daily newspapers (2013-1989-1983). Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(2), 145-164.
  • Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-13.
  • Butler, C. S. (1990). Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, 3.
  • Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J. (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex Pub Corp.
  • Chang, P. (2010). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Inductive learning for second language writers using a stance corpus (doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan, United States of America. Retrieved February 3, 2019 from
  • Chang, P. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, 24(2), 209-236.
  • Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 140-151.
  • Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2016). Explicit learning of authorial stance-taking by L2 doctoral students. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 49-80.
  • Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
  • Fowler, R. (2013). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
  • Gadzekpo, A. (2007). Fifty years of the media’s struggle for democracy in Ghana: Legacies and encumbrances. Ghana Studies, 10, 89-106.
  • Gajevic, S. (2016). Journalism and formation of argument. Journalism, 17(7), 865-881.
  • Golan, G. J., & Lukito, J. (2017). Newspaper editorial pages frame China similarly. Newspaper Research Journal, 38(2), 215-230.
  • Gotti, M. (2003). Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses. Modality in Contemporary English, 12.
  • Hall, H. L. (2003). Junior high journalism. Tailor & Francis, US.
  • Halliday, M. A. (1976). System and function in language: Selected papers.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (Second Edition). London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). Introduction: How big is a language? On the power of language. The Language of Science, 5.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hayat, N., & Juliana, A. W. (2016). A comparative analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: The case of Taliban’s attack on Malala Yousafzai. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(3), 1087-1101.
  • He, Y., & Wang, H. (2012, July). A corpus-based study of epistemic modality markers in Chinese research articles. In Workshop on Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 199-208). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Henry, F., & Tator, C. (2002). Discourse of domination: Racial bias in the Canadian English- language press. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Herndon, J. H. (1976). A survey of modern grammars; London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Hindman, E. B. (2003). The princess and the paparazzi: Blame, responsibility, and the media’s role in the death of Diana. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 666-688.
  • Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21-44.
  • Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2005). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53(2), 193-194.
  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 1(3), 239–256.
  • Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17, 433–454.
  • Hyland, K. (1998). Boosters, hedges and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18(3), 349–382.
  • Indarti, D. (2018). Syntactic complexity of online newspaper editorials across countries. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 294-307.
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
  • Kelling, K., & Thomas, R. J. (2018). The roles and functions of opinion journalists. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(4), 398-419.
  • Khalid, P. Z. B. M. (2013). Modality analysis of the newspaper articles about the Scottish Ship RMS Queen Elizabeth. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(9), 458-461.
  • Kuppers, A. (2012). Authorial presence and stance in German and French letters to shareholders. Subjectivity in Language and Discourse, 355.
  • Lawal, O. A. (2015). Pragmatics of truth and modality in newspaper editorials: An example of the punch and the tribune. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(4), 688-693.
  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maks, E. & Vossen, P. (2010). Annotation scheme and gold standard for Dutch subjective adjectives. Working paper, ELREC 2010.
  • Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English research articles: Strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. University of New South Wales.
  • Nartey, M., & Yankson, F. E. (2014). A semantic investigation into the use of modal auxiliary verbs in the manifesto of a Ghanaian political party. Int J Humanities Soc Sci, 4(3), 21-304.
  • Ngula, R. S. (2017). Epistemic modal verbs in research articles written by Ghanaian and international scholars: a corpus-based study of three disciplines. Brno studies in English, 43(2), 5-27.
  • Ntsane, M. F. S. (2015). The management of writer-reader interaction in newspaper editorials. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 108-123.
  • Nunoo, I. (2016). Determinants of news selection in the Ghanaian print media: A study of the daily graphic. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(3), 99-120.
  • Nworgu, K. O., Okoro, N., & Obi, C. (2018). The press and Nigeria’s foreign policy: A content analysis of selected issues (1985–1995). Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(3), 245-257.
  • Palmer, F. R. (2007). Mood and modality. Beijing: World Book Publishing Company.
  • Panocová, R. (2008). Expressions of modality in biomedical texts. SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation 3(1), 82–90.
  • Papafragou, A. (2005). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Delaware: University of Delaware Press.
  • Pho, P. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics and educational technology. Springer.
  • Porten-Chee, P. (2017). Frame building the “social digitization” in the German press. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 96-116.
  • Qian, L. (n. d.). Use of modal verbs in English writing by EFL learners. Retrieved November 23, 2018 from
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Rosenfeld, S. S. (2000). The op-ed page: A step to a better democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(3), 7-11.
  • Sadia, S., & Ghani, M. (2018). Modality in editorials of Pakistani English newspapers: A corpus based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 144-151.
  • Shayegh, K. (2012). Modality in political discourses of Barack Obama and Martin Luther King. Trends in Advanced Science and Engineering, 3(1), 2-8.
  • Shayegh, K., & Nabifar, N. (2012). Power in political discourses of Barack Obama. Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 3481-3491.
  • Siddique, A. R. (2017). Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus based study (unpublished master thesis). Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.
  • Smith, N. (2003). Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In R. Facchiretti, M. Krug & F. Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp.241-266). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Taavitsainen, I. (2001). Evidentiality and scientific thought-styles: English medical writing in late middle English and early modern English. In Modality in specialized texts: Selected papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference (pp. 21-52). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Tawab. (2000). Editorial coverage of women right. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Punjab University, Lahore.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. (2018). Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. In Intercultural perspectives on research writing (pp. 195-216). John Benjamin Publishing Company.