University Students' Perception and Utilization of Technology for Learning: The Case of Haramaya University

Sisay Awgichew Wondemtegegn 1 *
More Detail
1 Haramaya University, Ethiopia
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp. 130-149.
OPEN ACCESS   2066 Views   1852 Downloads   Published online: 24 Jan 2018
Download Full Text (PDF)


As technology has become more prevalent and accessible to students in their personal lives, learning experiences and interaction, it encouraged students to engage and generate innovative and creative ideas and sharing learning experiences. This paper examines university students` perceptions and utilization of technology for learning at Haramaya University in Ethiopia (as a case). The researcher used survey research design and questionnaire (students=298) as principal data collection instrument. The participant sampled using purposive, heterogeneity and systematic random sampling techniques. The collected data were analysed by descriptive (mean, percentage and frequency) and inferential statistics (t-test). Students` perception in relation to gender and their locality (rural and urban), and utilization of technology addressed by this study. The finding of the study revealed that there is no statistically significant mean difference between male and female students’ perceptions towards technology utilization for learning (t (296) = t -.102, p>0.05, p=0.919). This was the same for students who came from rural and urban areas (t (296) = t= -.126, p>0.05, p=0.900) and students have positive perception towards technology assisted learning. The paper revealed that students have been using technology for educational purpose and face challenges.


Wondemtegegn, S. A. (2018). University Students' Perception and Utilization of Technology for Learning: The Case of Haramaya University. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(1), 130-149.


  • Adedeji, O.A. (2010). The Development of modern information and communications technology in Ibadan: Creative Educational Publication Ltd, p. 58.
  • Azhar, M., Nasir, H, B. & Farah. N. (2011). Effects of use of ICT: students` perception at higher education level. Elixir Social Studies 38 (2011) 4118-4221.
  • Belal, A.R. (2011) “students` perception of computer Assisted Learning: an empirical study”, Int. J. Management in Education, Vol.5, No.1.pp.63-78.
  • Buabeng, A & Yidana, I. (2015). Innovation in education: Students` perception of implementing ICT in learning in second-cycle institution in Ghana: 7th World Conferences on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), 05-07 February 2015, Novotel Athens Convention center, Athens, Greece. www. Retrieved from Elsevier, in 2017.
  • Cavas, B. and Cavas, P, (2009). A Study on Sciences Teachers` Attitudes towards and Communication Technology in Education: TOJET, 8(2), 20-32.
  • Christina, K., and Lars, C. (2002). Students Perception of E-learning in University Education. Journal of Educational Media, Vol. 27, Nos, 1-2, 2002.
  • Drop, J. (2004). Experience and attitudes towards information technology among first year medical students in Denmark: Longitudinal questionnaire survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6 (1), e10.
  • Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies’ for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Gay, G, Blads, R. (2005). Information Technology for CXC CSEC, Oxford University Press, UK.
  • GTP-II- (2015/16-2019/20). Growth and Transformation Plan II (GTP-II-). National Planning Commission, Vol. I. Main text. May 2016. Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
  • Hawkins, R.J. (2002). Ten lesson for ICT and education in the developing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordance and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communication technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1-2), 101-116.
  • Kozma, R.B. (2005). National policies that connect ICT- based education reform to economic and social development. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environment, 1(2), 117-156.
  • Kubiatko, M., & Halakova, Z. (2009). Slovak high school students’ attitudes to ICT using in Biology lesson. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 743-748.
  • Miranda, H., & Russell, M. (2011). Predictors of teachers directed students’ use of technology in elementary classrooms: A multilevel SEM approach using data from the USEIT study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 301-323. Retrieved from EBSCO host.
  • Marc. L & Mariana, D. (2014). ICT as an Enabler of Transformation in Ethiopian. www. world bank. org/ICT
  • Mizrachi, D., & Shoham, S (2004). Computer attitudes and library anxiety among undergraduates: a study of Israel B. Ed students. International Information and Library Review, 36(2), 29-38.
  • Liu, P-L., Chen, C-J. and Chang, Y-J. (2010) “Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students” English reading comprehension, Computer &Education, Vol.54, No.2, pp.436-445.
  • Selwyn, N. (2007) “The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol, 23, No, 2, pp.83- 94.
  • Seyal, A, H., Rahim, M, &, N.A (2002). A study of computer attitudes of non-computing students of technical college in Burnei Darussalam. Journal of End User Computing, 14(2), 40-47.
  • Thomas Li-Ping Tang, M. Jill Austin.(2009). Students’ perception of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. ELSEVIER. Computer & Education 53(2009)1241-1255.
  • UNESCO. (2004).Use of Technology. Retrieved from:
  • William, M, L., Paprock, K., & Covington, B. (1999). Distance learning. The essential guide (sage Publications, Thousand and Oaks).