Turkish Series: Products of Popular Culture and Tools for Inclusive Globalization

Cansu Arisoy 1
More Detail
1 University of Salford, UK
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 129-142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2543
OPEN ACCESS   1200 Views   1985 Downloads   Published online: 15 Jan 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The thoughts and experiences of people consist of meanings and while sharing these meanings people share their cultures. Globalization is the concept that increases the mobility of these meanings and cultures. Understanding culture, globalization, and international relations is critical for the future of not only governments, but also for people and businesses. Going beyond the classical definitions of globalization and creating a bond between this concept and popular culture is one of the aims of this paper. The main target is to analyze the rise of Turkish series by taking this relationship as the base. There are various interpretations for globalization and culture because these are not narrow, strait jacket concepts. Therefore this paper aims to present a fresh and understandable approach to the relationship between globalization and popular culture by using Turkish soap operas as the case study. According to this paper, besides the dominant cultures, other cultures too, contribute to the popular culture industry. In this context the impact of Turkish series in diplomacy is discussed. Today one of the biggest wars of humanity is making globalization a constructive power for the people all around the world. Therefore this paper is important because it underlines the value of the inclusive character of globalization. Thus in this work it is underlined that in today’s world which leisure became the basis for the modern lives; popular culture must be used to bring an inclusive character to globalization for embracing all the humans around the world.

CITATION

Arisoy, C. (2016). Turkish Series: Products of Popular Culture and Tools for Inclusive Globalization. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2543

REFERENCES

  • Annan, K. (2000) “We The Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century”. United Nations.
  • Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Polity Press.
  • Cevik, S. B. (2014) “Turkish Soap Opera Diplomacy: A Western Projection by a Muslim Source” Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy. Vol:5, no: 1, p: 78-103.
  • During, S. (1997) “Popular Culture on a Global Scale: A Challenge for Cultural Studies?” Critical Inquiry. Vol:23, no:4, p.808-833.Summer.
  • Exports of Turkish Made TV Series Soar (August 26, 2014). Retrieved June 29, 2015http://www.aa.com.tr/en/news/379318--exports-of-turkish-made-tv-series-soar
  • Franz, K. and Smulyan, S. (2012) Major Problems in American Popular Culture. Cengage Learning: Wadsworth, Boston.
  • Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Holton, J. R. (1998) Globalization and the Nation-State. London and New York: Macmillan Press.
  • Horn, P. (2003) “Mass Culture, Popular Culture and Cultural Identity” Culture, Civilization and Human Society Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), vol:1.
  • Latin Amerika’daTürkDizisiFuryası (The Rise of Turkish Series in Latin America) (September 6, 2014). BBC Turkish News.Retrieved June 29, 2015.http://www.bbc.co.uk/turkce/haberler/2014/09/140905_turk_dizisi_latam.shtml? ocid
  • Lizardo, O. “Globalization and culture: A sociological perspective”, Center for the Critical Study of Global Power and PoliticsWorking Paper CSGP 07/8, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mattelart, A. (1982) Multinational Corporations and the Control of Culture: The Ideological Apparatuses of Imperialism. (Michael Chanan, Trans.), Humanities Press Intl Inc.
  • Moore R. (2013) “Soap Opera Diplomacy: Turkish TV in Greece”. The International, 12 February.
  • Reich, S. (1998) “What is Globalization? Four Possible Answers” Working Paper #261 The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. December.
  • Robinson, W. (2007) “Theories of Globalization” In (ed.) George Ritzer Blackwell Companion to Globalization. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rosenau, J. (1996) “The Dynamics of Globalisation: Towards an Operational Formulation,” San Diego, Paper presented at the International Studies Association Convention, 18 April.
  • Said, W. E. (1993) Culture and Imperialism.New York: Knopf.
  • Salem, P. (2011) “Turkey’s Image in the Arab World” TESEV Report, p.1-8.
  • Schiller, H. (1976) Communication and Cultural Domination. White Planes, New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.
  • Series Boost Turkish ‘soft power’ in Region (December 12, 2011).Hurriyet Daily News. Retrieved June 29, 2015 http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/series-boost-turkish-soft-powerinregion.aspx?pageID=238&nID=8919&NewsCatID=381
  • The Rise of Turkish Soap Power (June 27, 2013). BBC News. Retrieved June 29, 2015http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22282563
  • Tomlinson, J. (2003) “Globalization and Cultural Identity” In (ed.) David Held and Anthony McGrew The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Second Edition.Blackwell Publishing.
  • Yoruk, Z. and Vatikiotis, P. (2013) Soft Power or Illusion of Hegemony: The Case of the Turkish Soap Opera “Colonialism” International Journal of Communication. Vol: 7, p: 2361-2385.
  • Wright, S. (2000) Community and Communication: The Role of Language in Nation State Building and European Integration.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.