To be a TikToker in COVID-19 Era: An Experience of Social Influence

Rossella Iodice 1 * , Concetta Papapicco 1
More Detail
1 University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, ITALY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 11, Issue 1, Article No: e202103. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/9615
OPEN ACCESS   561 Views   343 Downloads   Published online: 20 Jan 2021
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Social networks are able to interface technological innovation and communication with sociality, thus redesigning the forms, practices, purposes of access and its relationship with everyday life, especially at a time when technology becomes the only way to feel part of a social group, like the COVID-19 period. The general objective of the research is to understand the experience of fruition of the social network Tiktok in the sample of participants, heterogeneous and representative of the reference population. The aim is to assess how the user or the entire social group lives the experience of the social because it is assumed that the result of the above experience can become a new form of social influence. The study aims to answer the following research questions: 1. How do people experience this new social media? 2. Is fun the new form of social influence? The methodology used is quantum-qualitative. It is, in fact, proposed first a Netnographic Analysis of observation and description of the social, and then use an automatic Content Analysis supported by Diatextual Analysis (the qualitative part). The results allow to theorize a different form of social influence, or “fun”, which becomes characteristic of the social network and the period.

CITATION

Iodice, R., & Papapicco, C. (2021). To be a TikToker in COVID-19 Era: An Experience of Social Influence. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(1), e202103. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/9615

REFERENCES

  • Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907
  • Borghi, A., & Iachini, S. (2004). Scienze della mente.
  • Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, 189, 228.
  • Gibson, PJ (1979, September). L’antenna vivaldi [The vivaldi antenna]. Nel 1979 9th European Microwave Conference.
  • Hogg, M. A., Vaughan, G. M., & Arcuri, L. (2016). Psicologia sociale: teorie e applicazioni [Social psychology: theories and applications]. Pearson.
  • ISTAT- Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (2018). Uso di Internet [Use of the Internet].
  • Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P. e Tugwell, D. (2004). Itri-04-08 il motore di schizzo [Itri-04-08 the sketch engine]. Tecnologia dell’informazione-Information technology, 105, 116.
  • Ma, L., Feng, J., Feng, Z., & Wang, L. (2019). Research on User Loyalty of Short Video App Based on Perceived Value—Take Tik Tok as an Example. In 2019 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887751
  • Mininni, G. (2007). La psycholinguistique à l’oeuvre dans la traduction [Psycholinguistics at work in translation].
  • Mininni, G. (2013). Psicologia culturale discorsiva [Discursive Cultural Psychology]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  • Paccagnella, L., & Vellar, A. (2016). Vivere online: identità, relazioni, conoscenza [Living online: identity, relationships, knowledge] (pp. 1-202). Il Mulino.
  • Papapicco, C. (2020). Informative Contagion: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) in Italian journalism. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202014. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7938
  • Pfefferbaum, B. e North, CS (2020). Salute mentale e pandemia di COVID-19 [Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic]. New England Journal of Medicine, 383, 510-512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Nativi digitali, immigrati digitali [Digital natives, digital immigrants]. All’orizzonte.
  • Priyawan, P., Rusdianti, A., Nurfauziah, A., & Asmarani, A. (2019). When fans and haters are on the same boat: a deconstructive reading of Bowo and TikTok. Makna (Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Bahasa, dan Budaya), 4(1), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.33558/makna.v4i1.1676
  • Qualizza, G. (2013). Facebook generation: i “nativi digitali” tra linguaggi del consumo, mondi di marca e nuovi media [Facebook generation: the “digital natives” between consumer languages, brand worlds and new media]. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste-EUT University of Trieste Editions.
  • Riva, G. (2012). Psicologia dei Nuovi Media [New Media Psychology]. Azione, Presenza, Identità e Relazioni nei Media Digitali e nei Social Media [Action, Presence, Identity and Relationships in Digital Media and Social Media]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Yang, S., Zhao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2019, July). Analysis of the Reasons and Development of Short Video Application—Taking Tik Tok as an Example. In Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Information and Social Science (ICISS 2019), Manila, Philippines (pp. 12-14).
  • Zhou, Q. (2019). Understanding User Behaviors of Creative Practice on Short Video Sharing Platforms – A Case Study of TikTok and Bilibili (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation).