The New Internet Discourse of Healthcare in Turkish Hospitals’ Social Media Pages

Elgiz Yılmaz 1 *
More Detail
1 Galatasaray University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue September 2016 - Special Issue, pp. 130-141.
OPEN ACCESS   1497 Views   650 Downloads   Published online: 01 Sep 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)


In this paper, discourse analysis of health is concerned with a critical analysis of the language use and the reproduction of dominant institutional ideologies in Turkish hospitals’ Facebook pages exploring the way in which health beliefs and the dissemination of health information are coded in the new media. This paper aims to analyze the various discourses of healthcare on Turkish hospitals’ Facebook pages using “Sosyomod” new media monitoring tool. Analyzing identified health topics on these pages offers a substantial contribution to the growing field of health literacy in online health communication. How do hospitals describe their health concerns and ask for information and advice? In answering these questions, the new Internet discourse of healthcare takes an interdisciplinary approach to discourse analysis, corpus linguistics and recent work in computer-mediated communication, and shows how these fields interplay in establishing new frameworks for health communication and health literacy researches.


Yılmaz, E. (2016). The New Internet Discourse of Healthcare in Turkish Hospitals’ Social Media Pages. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(September 2016 - Special Issue), 130-141.


  • Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, “Healthcare and Life Sciences Predictions 2020” November 2014,
  • Doğanyiğit, S. & Yılmaz, E. “Mobile Health Applications User Trends in Turkey”, Journalism and Mass Communication, January 2015, Vol. 5, No. 1, 45-50.
  • Fisher, J., & Clayton, M. (2012). Who gives a tweet: Assessing patients’ interest in the use of social media for health care. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Retrieved from
  • Halpert, A., Dalton, C. B., Palsson, O., Morris, C., Hu, Y., Bangdiwala, S., Hankins, J., Norton, N., & Drossman, D. A. (2008). Patient educational media preferences for information about irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 53, p. 3184.
  • O’Mara, B. (2012). Social media, digital video and health promotion in a culturally and linguistically diverse Australia. Health Promotion International. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das014, 2012.
  • Perlmutter, David D. (2008). Blogwars, Oxford University Press; 1 edition, accessed:
  • PwC Health Research Institute, “Healthcare delivery of the future: How digital technology can bridge time and distance between clinicians and consumers” November 2014. pers/pwc-hri-healthcare-technology-and-innovation.pdf
  • Rettberg, J.W. (2009). “Blogging”, Journal of Communication, Volume 59, Issue 2, 452.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, 73-100.
  • Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 2008.
  • Yang, S.-U., & Lim, J. (2009). The effects of blog-mediated public relations on relation trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(3), 341-359.