The Impact of Top-Down Communication on Career Satisfaction

Eylem Simsek 1 *
More Detail
1 Turkish Air Forces, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 196-210.
OPEN ACCESS   2403 Views   3551 Downloads   Published online: 26 Jul 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)


Organizational communication includes both interpersonal relationship and information exchange process by different levels. As an independent variable, organizational communication influences both organizations and individuals. This study aimed to investigate the impact of top-down communication on career satisfaction. The sample consisted of 205 office managers, executive assistants and secretaries working in different sectors in Istanbul. 16 cases were excluded due to missing data. The data form 189 participants were analyzed. Career Satisfaction Scale (Greenhaus, Parasuraman & Wormley,1990) and Top-Down Communication Scale (Downs & Hazen, 1977) were data collection instruments. The quantitative paradigm, including descriptive, relational, and comparative models was employed. In analyzing data, a set of correlation, analysis of variance, and multiple regression techniques were employed. Results reveal that top-down communication is positively and significantly correlated with career satisfaction (r = .457, p< .01). Top-down communication explains 20.9 % of the variance on career satisfaction. Institution explains additionally 4.7% variance on career satisfaction. Top-down communication was categorized as low and high top-down communication scores. When top-down communication groups compared, significant mean differences of career satisfaction were found. As age, occupation, institution, educational level and years in the present group differ, significant mean differences both on top-down communication and career satisfaction is found.
Various interactions of organizational communication dimensions with individual and organizational factors are found out day by day. It is clear that organizational communication contributes not only to the performance and effectiveness of the organization but also the attitudes, values, behaviors of the individuals within the organization (Simsek, 2011). Organizational communication consists of both individual and interpersonal communication levels. This study aims to evaluate organizational communication in terms of interpersonal hierarchical relationship. Organizational communication forms employee’s attitudes towards the organization. This study examined whether top-down communication affects employees’ career satisfaction evaluations.


Simsek, E. (2016). The Impact of Top-Down Communication on Career Satisfaction. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(3), 196-210.


  • Aktas, H. (2014). Relationship between career satisfaction and occupational commitment in the context of career stages with demographic variables: Research on office managers, executive assistants and secretaries. International Journal of Social Science, 26, 195212.
  • Allen, M. W., Gotcher, J. M., & Seibert, J. H. (1993). A decade of organizational communication research: Journal articles 1980–1991. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.) Communication Yearbook, 16, 252-230. New-bury Park: Sage.
  • Avcı, U., & Turunç, Ö. (2012). Dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgüte güvenin kariyer memnuniyetine etkisi: Lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 45-55.
  • Baker, K. (2002). Organizational communication. Chapter 13. Retrieved from awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch13.pdf
  • Barnett, B. R., & Bradley, L. (2007). The impact of organisational support for career development on career satisfaction. Career Development International, 12(7), 617-636.
  • Brandes, L., & Darai, D. (2014). The value of top-down communication for organizational performance. Univeristy of Zurich, Department of Economics,Working Paper No. 157.
  • Business Dictionary. (2015). Retrieved from
  • Commgap. (2008). Organizational communication. EXTGOVACC/ Resources/OrganizationalCommweb.pdf.
  • Deetz, S. (2000). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advanced in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3-46). New-bury Park: Sage.
  • Demirhan, Y., Kula, S., & Karagöz, G. (2014). The effect of job satisfaction and supervisor support on performance: The example of special operations polıce unit of Diyarbakır province. Süleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19(1), 285-297.
  • Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 63-73.
  • Friebel, G., & Raith, M. (2004). Abuse of authority and hierarchical communication. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(2), 224-244.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86. doi:10.2307/256352
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
  • Hahn, L. K., Lippert, L., & Paynton, S. T. (2014). Survey of Communication Study: Chapter 11. Organizational Communication.
  • Jablin, F. M. (1980). Superior’s upward influence, satisfaction, and openness in superiorsubordinate communication: A re-examination of the Pelz effect. Human Communication European Scientific Journal, 6(3), 210-220.
  • Joo, B. K., & Park, S. (2010). Career satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention: The effects of goal orientation, organizational learning culture and developmental feedback. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(6), 482-500.
  • Koeske, G. F., Kırk, S. A., Koeske, R. D., & Rauktis, M. D. (1994). Measuring the monday blues: Validation of job satisfaction scale for the human service. Social Work Research, 18, 27-35.
  • Larkin, T., & Larkin, S. (1994). Communicating Change: How to win support for new business directions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Leigh, J., Kravitz, R.L. Schembri, M., Samuels, S. J., & Mobley, S. (2002). Physicians’ career satisfaction across specialties. ArchInternMed,162(14), 1577-1584. doi: 10.1001/archinte. 162.14.1577.
  • Morgan, B. S., & William, A. S. (1983). Why internal communication is failing. Public Relation Journal, Relations Journal, 39(3), 15-17.
  • Perrewe, P. L., & Carlson, D. S. (2002). Do men and women benefit from social support equally? Results from a field examination within the work and family context. In D. L.
  • Nelson & D. S. Burke (Eds.), Gender, Work, Stress and Health: Current Research Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Putnam, L. L., & Cheney, G. (1985). Organizational communication: Historical development and future directions. In T. W. Benson (Ed.). Speech communication in the 20th century (pp. 130-156). Carbondale, IL: Southern University Press.
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
  • Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., &McCroskey, L. L. (2005). Organizational communication for survival: Making work, work (3rd edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Rubin, R.B., & Rubin, A.M. (1992). Antecedents of interpersonal communication motivation. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 305-317.
  • Simsek, E. (2011). The role of organizational communication and personality trait on organizational communication satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Eskişehir: Graduate School of Social Sciences of Anadolu University.
  • Turunç Ö. & Çelik, M. (2010). Çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansına etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 17(2), 183-206.
  • Wicks, R. J. (2005). Overcoming secondary stress in medical and nursing practice: A guide to professional resilience and personal well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Yüksel, İ., (2005). İş-aile çatışmasının kariyer tatmini, iş tatmini ve iş davranışları ile ilişkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 301-314.