The impact of AI-driven tools on student writing development: A case study

Raigul Zheldibayeva 1 2 * , Ana Karina de O. Nascimento 2 3, Vania Castro 2, Mary Kalantzis 2, Bill Cope 2
More Detail
1 Zhetysu University named after Ilyas Zhansugurov, Taldykorgan, KAZAKHSTAN
2 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
3 Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, BRAZIL
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 15, Issue 3, Article No: e202526. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16738
OPEN ACCESS   1120 Views   403 Downloads   Published online: 08 Aug 2025
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to examine the impact of the CGScholar (Common Ground Scholar) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Helper on a pilot research initiative involving the writing development of 11th-grade students in English Language Arts. CGScholar AI Helper is an evolving and innovative web-based application designed to support students in their writing tasks by providing specified AI-generated feedback. This is a case study and relates to one of six interventions, involving one teacher and six students in a diverse school. A qualitative thematic approach to data analysis is employed, combining data from students’ initial and reviewed writing assignments, selected focus group feedback, teacher’s post-survey, and the research team’s observations. It explores to what extent customized AI-driven feedback can support students’ writing development. The findings suggest that the implementation of AI helper supported the development of students’ writing in several ways. Therefore, researchers conclude AI can be helpful in K-12 writing considering how it is calibrated to serve the teacher’s teaching objectives. The research also elicited suggestions from the teacher and students about ways of improving the still in development tool, which it is recommended to be taken into consideration.
Keywords: AI-driven writing tools, writing skills, CGScholar AI Helper project, AI feedback

CITATION

Zheldibayeva, R., Nascimento, A. K. D. O., Castro, V., Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2025). The impact of AI-driven tools on student writing development: A case study. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(3), e202526. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16738

REFERENCES

  • Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, Article 140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527
  • Akmal, A. (2017). Influence of perceived usefulness and ease of use on students’ continuous intention in learning online English lessons: An extended TAM. In Proceedings of the 4th UAD TEFL International Conference (pp. 28–33). https://doi.org/10.12928/utic.v1.146.2017
  • Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. High Education, 86, 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
  • Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the long view: From mechanical intelligence to cyber-social systems. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00029-1
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2023). Generative AI comes to school (GPTs and all that fuss): What now? In M. A. Peters et al. (Eds.), AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses (pp. 13–17). Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2024). Generative AI as a writing technology: Challenges and opportunities for school writing. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_314-1
  • Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Zapata, G. C. (2025). Language learning after generative AI. In G. C. Zapata (Ed.), Generative AI technologies, multiliteracies, and language education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003531685-2
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Evans, R., & Sinha, N. (2024). Bridging the gap: Diversity initiatives in AI education. Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, 3(1), 474–477. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31260
  • Farahani, M., & Ghasemi, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive study. Forum for Education Studies, 2(3), Article 1379. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i3.1379
  • Illinois State Board of Education. (2023). Illinois report card. Illinois Report Card. https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/
  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2025). Literacy in the time of artificial intelligence. Reading Research Quarterly, 60, Article e591. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.591
  • Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
  • Martin, R. C. (2009). Agile software development: Principles, patterns, and practices. Prentice Hall.
  • Marzuki, W., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, I., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
  • Miller, E., Porter, J., & Barbagallo, M. (2022). Simplifying qualitative case study research methodology: A step-by-step guide using a palliative care example. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2363–2379. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6478
  • Saunders, C. H., Sierpe, A., von Plessen, C., Kennedy, A. M., Leviton, L. C., Bernstein, S. L., Goldwag, J., King, J. R., Marx, C. M., Pogue, J. A., Saunders, R. K., Van Citters, A., Yen, R. W., Elwyn, G., & Leyenaar, J. K. (2023). Practical thematic analysis: A guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis. BMJ, 381, Article e074256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-074256
  • Shahzad, K., Khan, S. A., Iqbal, A., Ahmed, S., Javeed, A. M. D., & Mohamed, O. (2025). Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence in libraries: A systematic literature review. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241313368
  • Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
  • Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
  • Steinbauer, G., Kandlhofer, M., Chklovski, T., & Heintz, F. (2021). A differentiated discussion about AI education K-12. KI–Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00724-8
  • Stober, T., & Hansmann, U. (2009). Agile software development: Best practices for large software development projects. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70832-2
  • Tzirides, A. O., Saini, A., Zapata, G., Searsmith, D., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Castro, V., Kourkoulou, T., Jones, J., Abrantes da Silva, R., Whiting, J., & Kastania, N. P. (2023). Generative AI: Implications and applications for education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07605
  • Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
  • Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
  • Zheldibayeva, R. (2025). GenAI as a learning buddy for non-English majors: Effects on listening and writing performance. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, Article e2025051. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.51