Students’ Perception About the Incorporation of Technological Tools in the Educational Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ricardo-Adán Salas-Rueda 1 * , Jesús Ramírez-Ortega 1, Clara Alvarado-Zamorano 1, Antonio Domínguez-Hernández 1
More Detail
1 Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MEXICO
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 12, Issue 3, Article No: e202218.
OPEN ACCESS   1467 Views   857 Downloads   Published online: 16 Jun 2022
Download Full Text (PDF)


Currently, teachers are changing the planning and organization of the courses due to the appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This mixed research analyzes the perception of students about the use of Google Classroom, smartphones, and Google Meet through machine learning and decision tree techniques (data science). The participants are 76 students from the National Preparatory School No. 6 “Antonio Caso” who took the universal literature course in the 2021 school year. The incorporation of Google Classroom allowed that these students reviewed the contents, consulted the multimedia resources, sent the tasks and established a communication from anywhere. Also, smartphones allowed the communication in the virtual classes, search for information on the Internet and review of the school contents at any time. Lastly, these students used Google Meet to answer their questions, understand the school topics and actively participate. The machine learning technique indicates that the use of Google Classroom, smartphones, and Google Meet positively influence the active role of the students during the realization of the school activities. The decision tree technique determines 3 predictive models about the use of these technological tools considering the profile of the students. In conclusion, technological tools such as Google Classroom, smartphones, and Google Meet play a fundamental role to plan, organize and carry out new educational activities and practices in the distance modality.


Salas-Rueda, R.-A., Ramírez-Ortega, J., Alvarado-Zamorano, C., & Domínguez-Hernández, A. (2022). Students’ Perception About the Incorporation of Technological Tools in the Educational Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(3), e202218.


  • Abuzant, M., Ghanem, M., Abd-Rabo, A., & Daher, W. (2021). Quality of using Google Classroom to support the learning processes in the automation and programming course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(6), 72-87.
  • Aguilar-Díaz, F. C., Arcos-Velasco, M. R., & Ramírez-Trujillo, M. A. (2020). Questionnaire on knowledge and practices of dental prevention: Design and validation. Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento [Entreciencias: Dialogues in the Knowledge Society], 7(19), 1-9.
  • Albashtawi, A. H., & Al-Bataineh, K. B. (2020). The effectiveness of Google Classroom among EFL students in Jordan: An innovative teaching and learning online platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 78-88.
  • Altakhayneh, B. H. (2022). Impact of using flipped classroom strategy in developing the mathematical thinking of pre-service teachers in open education systems in Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(3), 228-244.
  • Anderson, R. A., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2012). Statistics for business & economics. Cengage Learning.
  • Bernacki, L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 1-8.
  • Chen, B.,Yang, T.,Wan, Y., Xiao, L., Xu, C., Shen, Y., & Qin, Q. (2021). Nursing students’ attitudes toward mobile learning: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(4), 477-485.
  • Díaz-Sainz, G., Pérez, G., Gómez-Coma, L., Ortiz-Martínez, V. M., Domínguez-Ramos, A., Ibanez, R., & Rivero, M. J. (2021). Mobile learning in chemical engineering: An outlook based on case studies. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 132-145.
  • Goodyear, P. (2020). Design and co-configuration for hybrid learning: Theorising the practices of learning space design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1045-1060.
  • Gouseti, A. (2021). ‘We’d never had to set up a virtual school before’: Opportunities and challenges for primary and secondary teachers during emergency remote education. Review of Education, 9(3), 1-12.
  • Hu, X., Chiu, M. M., Leung, W. M., & Yelland, N. (2021). Technology integration for young children during COVID-19: Towards future online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1513-1537.
  • Maity, S., Sahu, N. T., & Sen, N. (2021). Panoramic view of digital education in COVID-19: A new explored avenue. Review of Education, 9(2), 405-423.
  • Marachi, R., & Quill, L. (2020). The case of Canvas: Longitudinal datafication through learning management systems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 418-434.
  • Martin, B. A. (2021). Teachers perceptions of Google Classroom: Revealing urgency for teacher professional learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(1), 1-17.
  • Navarro-Morales, M. E., & Londoño, R. (2019). Inverted classroom teaching in the first-year design studio, a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2651-2666.
  • Ortiz, S., & Green, M. (2019). Trends and patterns of mobile learning: A study of mobile learning management system access. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 161-176.
  • Ospina-García, N., Díaz-Velásquez, M. F., Tavera-Romero, C. A., Ortiz-Monedero, J. H., & Khalaf, O. I. (2021). Remote academic platforms in times of a pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(21), 121-131.
  • Raghunathan, K., McKenna, L., & Peddle, M. (2021). Use of academic electronic medical records in nurse education: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 101, 104889.
  • Rehm, M., Moukarzel, S., Daly, A. J., & Del-Fresno, M. (2021). Exploring online social networks of school leaders in times of COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1414-1433.
  • Rehn, N., Maor, D., & Mc-Conney, A. (2017). Navigating the challenges of delivering secondary school courses by videoconference. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 802-813.
  • Roig-Vila, R., Urrea-Solano, M., & Merma-Molina, G. (2021). Communication at university classrooms in the context of COVID-19 by means of videoconferencing with Google Meet. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia [Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education], 24(1), 197-220.
  • Roth, J. J., Pierce, M., & Brewer, S. (2020). Performance and satisfaction of resident and distance students in videoconference courses. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(2), 296-310.
  • Salas-Rueda, R. A. (2021). Use of flipped classroom in the marketing career during the educational process on financial mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4261-4284.
  • Salas-Rueda, R. A., Castañeda-Martínez, R., Eslava-Cervantes, A. L., & Alvarado-Zamorano, C. (2022). Teachers’ perception about MOOCs and ICT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep343.
  • Sette-de-Souza, P. (2021). Motivating learners in pandemic period through WhatsApp and Google Meet. Journal of Dental Education, 85, 1156-1157.
  • Sudarsana, K., Anggara-Putra, I. B., Temon-Astawa, I. N., & Yogantara, W. L. (2019). The use of Google Classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics, 14, 1-5.
  • Tarango, J., Machin-Mastromatteo, J., & Romo-González, J. (2019). Design and learning evaluation of Google Classroom and Chamilo. Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH [Journal of Educational Research of the REDIECH], 10(19), 91-104.
  • Terry, P. C., Parsons-Smith, R. L., King, R., & Terry, V. R. (2021). Influence of sex, age, and education on mood profile clusters. PLOS One, 16(2), e0245341.
  • Tezer, M., & Cimsir, B. T. (2018). The impact of using mobile-supported learning management systems in teaching web design on the academic success of students and their opinions on the course. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 402-410.
  • Tsai, Y. R. (2021). Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 979-1011.
  • Van-Leeuwen, C. A., Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Belikov, O. (2021). Never-ending repetitiveness, sadness, loss, and “juggling with a blindfold on:” Lived experiences of Canadian college and university faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1306-1322.
  • Wilang, J. D., & Garcia, M. A. (2021). Evidence-based smartphone use among engineering students in an academic writing curse. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(17), 267-276.
  • Xu, S. (2022). Recommendation of online learning resources for personalized fragmented learning based on mobile devices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(3), 34-49.
  • Yuen, A. H., Cheng, M., & Chan, F. H. (2019). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2520-2535.