Representations of sustainability by Instagram influencers: An examination in the context of digital opinion leadership

Tüba Karahisar 1 *
More Detail
1 Usak University, Usak, TÜRKİYE
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 16, Issue 3, Article No: e202641. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/18943
OPEN ACCESS   20 Views   11 Downloads   Published online: 07 Jul 2026
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The destruction of nature over the past century, rapid urbanization, population growth, and the pollution that accompanies these processes, together with climate change and disasters, indicate that the world is increasingly facing serious threats. In this context, sustainability has also emerged as a social issue. Social media has become an arena where sustainability-related content circulates. This study aims to examine through which thematic frameworks sustainability discourse is presented in sustainability-themed posts shared by influencers who actively use Instagram in Turkey. The research was conducted using a qualitative content analysis approach based on social media content. A total of 2,155 content units (posts and reels) shared by 15 Instagram influencers were analyzed. The analysis identified three main themes: presentation of sustainable lifestyle, digital representation of sustainability discourse, and follower interaction and feedback. The findings indicate that sustainability discourse was predominantly framed through individual lifestyle practices such as reuse, recycling, zero-waste living, and responsible consumption. By contrast, structural environmental issues appeared less frequently within the analyzed content. Follower interactions were largely supportive, while critical engagement remained limited. The findings further suggest that these communication practices display characteristics associated with discussions of digital opinion leadership in the literature. However, the study does not directly measure influence, persuasion, or behavioral change among followers. Unlike the consumption-oriented approaches that dominate much of the influencer literature, this study examines how sustainability is thematically represented in digital content, using Turkey as its empirical context.

CITATION

Karahisar, T. (2026). Representations of sustainability by Instagram influencers: An examination in the context of digital opinion leadership. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(3), e202641. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/18943

REFERENCES

  • Abidin, C., & Ots, M. (2015). The influencer’s dilemma: The shaping of new brand professions between credibility and commerce [Paper presentation]. The 98th Annual Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference.
  • Apaydın, İ. Z. (2025). Sosyal medyada sürdürülebilir pazarlama: Yeşil etkileyici stratejileri [Sustainable marketing on social media: Green influencer strategies.]. In K. Deligöz (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir pazarlama yeni çağın dinamikleri (pp. 141-165). Özgür Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub694.c2948
  • Arslan, E. (2022). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik [Validity and reliability in qualitative research]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 51(1), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1116878
  • Aydın, S., & Tufan, F. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil kavramları bağlamında Y kuşağının satın alma davranışları [Purchasing behaviors of the millennial generation in the context of sustainability and green concepts]. Selçuk İletişim, 11(2), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.377009
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır [Qualitative research process: How to conduct qualitative research]? Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299
  • Beulah, P., & Chitrakala, I. (2024). Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards sustainability: The role of influencers in shaping eco-conscious behavior. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.29716
  • Boschele, F. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik, tüketim ve media [Sustainability, consumption and media]. İnsan & İnsan, 7(26), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.757873
  • Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005
  • Castillo-Abdul, B., Romero-Rodríguez, L., & Fernández-Rodríguez, C. (2024). Lifestyle eco-influencers advertising: Is engagement driven by content or fandom. Comunicação e Sociedade, 45, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.45(2024).5629
  • Çepni Şener, B., & Yılmaz, N. (2023). Sürdürülebilir modaya yön veren markaların Instagram gönderileri üzerine bir araştırma [A study on Instagram posts of brands that are setting trends in sustainable fashion]. Akdeniz İletişim, (43), 42-66. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1369308
  • Chwialkowska, A. (2019). How sustainability influencers drive green lifestyle adoption on social media: The process of green lifestyle adoption explained through the lenses of the minority influence model and social learning theory. Management of Sustainable Development Sibiu, 11(1), 33-42.
  • Dekoninck, H., Houtven, E. V., & Schmuck, D. (2023). Inspiring g(re)en Z: Unraveling (para)social bonds with climate influencers on social media. Environmental Communication, 17(7), 701-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2237693
  • Engindeniz, G., & Şener, N. (2023). Tüketim karşıtı eğilimlerin sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi kapsamında değerlendirilmesi: Girişim örnekleri üzerine bir inceleme [Assessing anti-consumption trends within the context of sustainability communication: A review of initiative examples]. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları, 6(1), 237-259.
  • Habermas, J. (2013). Kamusallığın yapısal dönüşümü [Structural transformation of the public sphere]. İletişim.
  • Jalali, S., & Khalid, H. (2021). The influence of Instagram influencers’ activity on green consumption behavior. Business Management and Strategy, 12(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v12i1.18265
  • Jiao, Y., Mohamad Saleh, M. S., & Huang, M. (2025). Climate change information sharing behavior on social media among young users in Guangzhou, China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(2), Article e202511 https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15985
  • Kapoor, P. S., Balaji, M. S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Greenfluencers as agents of social change: The effectiveness of sponsored messages in driving sustainable consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2021-0776
  • Kara, T. (2013). Sosyal medya endüstrisi [social media industry]. Beta.
  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
  • Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2016). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
  • Küçükoğlu, M. (2014). Sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil yenilik perspektifinde Türk işletmelerinin incelenmesi [An examination of Turkish businesses from a sustainability and green innovation perspective] [PhD thesis, Istanbul University].
  • Kumar, K., Venugopal, P., Anjani Devi, S., Aswinipriya, S., & Vinoda Rao, C. (2023). Instagram influencers credibility dimensions and purchase intention of followers: Empirical evidence. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i1.5705
  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
  • Oyur, E. (2019). Sürdürülebilir iletişim [Sustainable communication]. In M. Çelikkol, & S. Bengül (Eds.), İşletme ve ekonomi yazıları (pp. 133-149). Ekin.
  • Özçetin, B. (2019). Kitle iletişim kuramları [Mass communication theories]. İletişim.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244
  • Prodnik, J. A. (2025). Power asymmetries in the algorithmic formation of public opinion. Dialogues on Digital Society, 2(1), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251385702
  • Rozaq, M., Dianita, I. A., Wisudawaty, H., & Kusmareza Adim, A. (2025). Affordances of short video platforms and digital communication innovation. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1660358
  • San Cornelio, G., Martorell, S., & Ardèvol, E. (2024). “It is the voice of the environment that speaks”, digital activism as an emergent form of environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 18(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2296850
  • Şen, H., Kaya, A., & Alpaslan, B. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik üzerine tarihsel ve güncel bir perspektif [A historical and contemporary perspective on sustainability]. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 29(107), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.39101
  • Şenel, G., & Karaağaoğlu, N. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik ekseninde sinfluencerlar aracılığıyla iletişim [Communication through influencers on the axis of sustainability]. In Proceedings of the 6th Alaaddin Asna Mesleki Gelişim Sempozyumu (pp. 28-44).
  • Şener, N., & Öymen, G. (2023). Fenomen aktivizmi: Çevreci fenomenler üzerine bir araştırma [Phenomenal activism: A study on environmental phenomena]. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 127-152. https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.9.16.122
  • Stiefvatter, I. (2022). Sinnfluencers on the rise – A critical visual content analysis of green and mainstream influencers on Instagram [Master’s thesis, Universität Innsbruck].
  • Tan Gülcan, D. (2021). Türlerin yok oluşunun antropojenik nedenleri [Anthropogenic causes of species extinction]. Antropoloji, 41, 4-53. https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.757509
  • Tavman, B., & Doğan, D. (2025). How greenfluencers promote the zero-waste movement on Instagram? Evidence from Türkiye. İstanbul Nişantaşı University Journal of Social Science, 13(1), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.52122/nisantasisbd.1653401
  • Turgut, G. (2014). Ekolojik sürdürülebilirlik ve küçülme [Ecological sustainability and downsizing]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 137-165.
  • Tutar, H. (2022). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik: Bir model önerisi [Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A model proposal]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227323
  • Ünsal, R. (2024) İklim değişikliği ile mücadelede Paris anlaşması ve iklim adaleti [The Paris Agreement and climate justice in the fight against climate change]. Ekonomi, Yönetim, Politika, 2(2), 112-126.
  • Vilkaite-Vaitone, N. (2024). From likes to sustainability: How social media influencers are changing the way we consume. Sustainability, 16, Article 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041393
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.