Reaching Our Young Citizens: Comparing Model of Japanese and Indonesian Civic Participation in the Online Sphere

Desideria Cempaka Wijaya Murti 1 *
More Detail
1 Colorado State University, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 156-172.
OPEN ACCESS   1515 Views   2019 Downloads   Published online: 26 Jul 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)


The expansion of online media as a public sphere for youth political participation created an ephemeral scholarly conversation. Online media offers the opportunity for the youth to involve in politics as good citizens by following the novel civic style in the web sphere, developing new platform in communication style, and engaging in online community. Indonesian and Japanese models on civic engagement in the web sphere will enrich the Asian perspectives from the established theoretical framework in the western standpoint. Japan and Indonesia are two compatible counterparts to contrast the Asian case study. Both countries are relatively new in democracy, experiencing massive changes in the governments, political parties, penetration of technologies, and youth lifestyle. Both countries experience the similar struggles to understand the digital citizenship among young people. This research will answer the big question on how and to what extend the young citizens actively involved in political participation via media online. There are two prominent theories as the platform to configure the comparison of young citizenship model in Japan and Indonesia. First, the researcher will use the framework of Dutiful and Self Actualized Citizenship (AC-DC). Each type of citizenship develop distinguish characteristics in terms of civic style and communication logics. There are four competences in each model, such as knowledge, expression, public skills, and action skills. Secondly, this study will find the pattern of online media usage for the youth political and civic participation and to archive the youth civic engagements as an appreciation towards democratic growth in the relatively progressive Asian country. 


Murti, D. C. W. (2016). Reaching Our Young Citizens: Comparing Model of Japanese and Indonesian Civic Participation in the Online Sphere. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(3), 156-172.


  • Alabaster, J. (2008). Web society opts to stay anonymous. The Japan Times. October 2 2008.
  • Albrecht, S. (2006). “Whose Voice Is Heard in Online Deliberation?: A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet.” Information, Communication & Society 9, 1: 62–82. doi:10.1080/13691180500519548.
  • Bennett, L. (2008). Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  • Bennett, L. and Alexandra Segerberg. (2011). “Digital Media and the Personalization of Collective Action: Social Technology and the Organization of Protests Against the Global Economic Crisis.” Information, Communication & Society 14, 6: 770–799. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141.
  • Bennett, L, Chris Wells, and Deen Freelon. (2011). “Communicating Civic Engagement: Contrasting Models of Citizenship in the Youth Web Sphere.” Journal of Communication 61,5: 835–56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01588.x.
  • Deguchi, M. (1999). “A Comparative View of Civil Society”, Washington-Japan Journal. Special Issue, Spring: 11-20.
  • Farrall, K. (2012). “Online Collectivism, Individualism and Anonymity in East Asia”. Surveillance & Society, 9, 4: 424-440. ISSN: 1477-7487.
  • Flanagin, A. and Miriam Metzger. (2008). “Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility."Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Edited by Miriam Metzger and Andrew Flanagin. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 5–28. doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.005.
  • Guskin, E. (2011). Japan crisis overtakes social media . Pew research center publications. Retrieved on May 8, 2012, from
  • Habermas, J. (1999). Habermas and the Public Sphere: Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. In Craig Calhoun (ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press,1999.
  • Imata, K. (1999). “Civil Society in the U.S. and Japan: Polar Opposites”. Washington Japan Journal, Special Issue, Spring: 21-28.
  • Jakarta Globe. (2011). Facebook Has Lots of Users in Indonesia, Just Not A Lot of Usage. Jakarta Globe. May 28, 2011.
  • Jakarta Globe. (2011). Indonesia now Home for 6th Twitter Users in The World. Jakarta Globe. January 10, 2010.
  • Kazuaki, N. (2008). Can YouTube cure political apathy?. The Japan Times. September 12, 2008.
  • Lim, M. (2012). “Life is Local in the Imagined Global Community: Islam and Politics in the Indonesian Blogosphere.”Journal of Media and Religion, 11:127–140. doi 10.1080/15348423.2012.706144.
  • Matsumura, N. (2008). “Analysis of Interaction Mechanism in Online Communities.” In Toyoaki Nishida (ed.). Engineering Approaches to Conversational Informatic. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
  • Mc Kenzie, B. (2007). “Reconsidering the Effects of Bonding Social Capital: A Closer Look at Black Civil Society Institutions in America.” Political Behavior 30,1: 25–45. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9038-5.
  • Mouffe, C. (1999). “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research: 745– 58.
  • Mouritsen, P. (2003). “What's the Civil in Civil Society? Robert Putnam, Italy and the Republican Tradition.” Political Studies, 51, 4: 650–668. doi 10.1111/j.0032- 3217.2003.00451.x.
  • Nikkei Business Publishing. (2011, April 27). “Thanks to twitter we didn’t panic in the smoke:” Disaster and SNS through 550 messages [Kokuen no naka demo, twitter no okage de panikku ni narazu: yaku 550 ken no koe de wakatta “shinsai to SNS”]. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from nt
  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Schellong, A. (2008). “Government 2.0: An Exploratory Study of Social Networking Services in Japanese Local Government”, Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 2, 4: 225-242. doi: 10.1108/17506160810917936
  • Schwartz, F. (2002). “Civil Society in Japan Reconsidered”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 3,2: 195-215.
  • Situmorang, A.W. (2013). Gerakan Sosial: Teori & Praktik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Van Londen, M, Karen Phalet, and Louk Hagendoorn. (2007). “Civic Engagement and Voter Participation Among Turkish and Moroccan Minorities in Rotterdam.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33,8: 1201–26. doi:10.1080/13691830701613991.
  • Van Heelsum, A. (2007). “Political Participation and Civic Community of Ethnic Minorities in Four Cities in the Netherlands.” Politics 25,1 : 19–30.
  • Van Wolferen, K. (1991). The Enigma of Japanese Power. New York: Vintage Books Publisher.
  • Ward, J. (2011). “Reaching Citizens Online: How Youth Organizations Are Evolving Their Web Presence.” Information, Communication & Society 14,6: 917–36. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.572982.
  • White, B. and Suzanne Naafs. (2011). “Generasi Antara: Refleksi Tentang Studi Pemuda Indonesia.” Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 1, 2: 89–106.
  • Woolley, J., Anthony Limperos, and Mary Beth Oliver. (2010). “The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups.” Mass Communication and Society 13,5 : 631–52. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516864.
  • Yoshida, S. (1999). “Rethinking the Public Interest in Japan: Civil Society in the Making.” in Tadashi Yamamoto (ed.). Deciding the Public Good: Governance and Civil Society in Japan, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.