Pulling a rabbit out of a hat: News agency’s agenda-setting power in Latvia

Lāsma Šķestere 1 *
More Detail
1 Riga Stradins University, Riga, LATVIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 15, Issue 4, Article No: e202537. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17485
OPEN ACCESS   45 Views   25 Downloads   Published online: 02 Dec 2025
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research paper looks at how Latvian News Agency (LETA), the only national news agency in Latvia, affects the coverage of national news. The purpose of this study is to examine the phenomenon of ‘churnalism’ in the online news media, with a focus on one of the most significant state-level reforms, the administrative territorial reform, which came into force on July 1, 2021. Cosine similarity and the Levenshtein index were used as metrics in natural language processing to evaluate the degree to which online news media depend on the content of the news agency and to examine the level of originality in online news articles. The study reveals that the news agency serves as the catalyst for 47% of online news media articles. Moreover, 37% of news websites’ content is almost verbatim produced by the news agency. In-depth interviews (n = 4) with editors-in-chief of leading media outlets and LETA confirm that, due to limited alternatives and resource constraints, reliance on the agency is not only habitual but structurally embedded. These patterns suggest a heavy dependency on a single source which poses risks to media diversity, editorial independence, and ultimately the democratic quality of the public sphere.
Keywords: intermedia agenda-setting, news agency, churnalism, natural language processing, Levenshtein, cosine similarity

CITATION

Šķestere, L. (2025). Pulling a rabbit out of a hat: News agency’s agenda-setting power in Latvia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4), e202537. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17485

REFERENCES

  • Barker, G. (2009). The crumbling estate. Griffith Review, 25, 117–123.
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226062785.001.0001
  • Boczkowski, P. J., & De Santos, M. (2007). When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication, 24(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701313025
  • Boumans, J. (2018). Subsidizing the news? Organizational press releases’ influence on news media’s agenda and content. Journalism Studies, 19(15), 2264–2282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338154
  • Boumans, J., Trilling, D., Vliegenthart, R., & Boomgaarden, H. (2018). The agency makes the (online) news world go round: The impact of news agency content on print and online news. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1768–1789.
  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (2000). National and international news agencies: Issues of crisis and realignment. Gazette, 62(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549200062001001
  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (2010). News agencies in the turbulent era of the Internet. Lexikon.
  • Boyer, D. (2011). News agency and news mediation in the digital era. Social Anthropology, 19(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00135.x
  • Brandenburg, H. (2002). Who follows whom?: The impact of parties on media agenda formation in the 1997 British general election campaign. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0200700303
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Breen, M. J. (1997). A cook, a cardinal, his priests, and the press: Deviance as a trigger for intermedia agenda setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400208
  • Cagé, J., Hervé, N., & Viaud, M.-L. (2019). The production of information in an online world: Is copy right? NET Institute. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2672050
  • Chyi, H. I. (2005). Willingness to pay for online news: An empirical study on the viability of the subscription model. Journal of Media Economics, 18(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327736me1802_4
  • Davies, N. (2008). Flat earth news. Chatto & Windus.
  • Doyle, G. (2015). Why ownership pluralism still matters in a multi-platform world. In P. Valcke, R. G. Picard, & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Media pluralism and diversity: Concepts, risks and global trends (297–309). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304308_18
  • Drazdovska, I. (2023). Globālajās platformās ‘Facebook’, ‘Google’ un citās tērējam arvien vairāk naudas reklāmai [We are spending more and more money on advertising on global platforms like Facebook, Google and others.]. delfi.lv. https://www.delfi.lv/bizness/biznesa_vide/globalajas-platformas-facebook-google-un-citas-terejam-arvien-vairak-naudas-reklamai.d?id=55453260
  • Forde, S., & Johnston, J. (2013). The news triumvirate: Public relations, wire agencies and online copy. Journalism Studies, 14(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.679859
  • Gemius. (2021). Most visited news websites, 2021. Gemius. https://gemius.com/lv/blogs/gemius-top-20-apmekletakas-vietnes-2021-gada/
  • Harcup, T. (2014). A dictionary of journalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199646241.001.0001
  • Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
  • Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2017). Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969
  • Herbert, J., & Thurman, N. (2007). Paid content strategies for news websites: An empirical study of British newspapers’ online business models. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701275523
  • Jang, S. M., & Park, Y. J. (2017). Redirecting the focus of the agenda: Testing the zero-sum dynamics of media attention in news and user-generated media. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3998–4017.
  • Johnston, J. (2009). Not wrong for long: The role and penetration of news wire agencies in the 24/7 landscape Global Media Journal–Australian Edition, 3(1), 1–16.
  • Johnston, J., & Forde, S. (2011). The silent partner: News agencies and 21st century news. International Journal of Communication, 5, 195–214.
  • Karlsson, M. (2011). The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism, 12(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388223
  • Klinenberg, E. (2005). Convergence: News production in a digital age. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270346
  • Lewis, J., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2008). A compromised fourth estate? UK news journalism, public relations and news sources. Journalism Studies, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701767974
  • Manning, P. (2008). The press association and news agency sources. In B. Franklin (Ed.), Pulling newspapers apart (pp. 247–256). Routledge.
  • Paterson, C. (2005). News agency dominance in international news on the Internet. In D. Skinner, J. Compton, & M. Cahser (Eds.), Converging media, diverging politics (pp. 145–163). Lexington Books.
  • Paterson, C. (2007). International news on the Internet: Why more is less. Ethical Space: International Journal of Communication Ethics, 4(1/2), 57–66.
  • Paterson, C. (2011). The international television news agencies: The world from London. Peter Lang.
  • Protess, D., & McCombs, M. (1991). Agenda setting. Readings on media, public opinion and policy making. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Raward, D., & Johnston, J. (2009). FM radio news: Spreading the news or spread too thin? Australian Journalism Review, 31(1), 63–76.
  • Reporters of the Associated Press. (2007). Breaking news: How the Associated Press has covered war, peace and everything else. Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been? Where is it going? In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 555–594). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708
  • Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01263.x
  • Rožukalne, A., & Skulte, I. (2024). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: Application of the media pluralism monitor in the European member states and in candidate countries in 2023. Country report: Latvia [Research Project Report]. European University Institute, Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF). https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77007
  • Saridou, T., Spyridou, L., & Veglis, A. (2019). Churnalism on the rise? Assessing convergence effects on editorial practices. Digital Journalism, 5(8), 1006–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1342209
  • Shoemaker, P., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653
  • Šķestere, L., & Darģis, R. (2022). Agenda-setting dynamics during COVID-19: Who leads and who follows? Social Sciences, 11(12), Article 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120556
  • van den Heijkant, L., van Selm, M., Hellsten, I., & Vliegenthart, R. (2019). Intermedia agenda setting in a policy reform debate. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1890–1912. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9005
  • Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2008). The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500409
  • Vonbun, R., Königslöw, K. K., & Schoenbach, K. (2016). Intermedia agenda-setting in a multimedia news environment. Journalism, 17(8), 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595475
  • Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Ruigrok, N. (2018). A gatekeeper among gatekeepers. Journalism Studies, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1190663
  • Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S., & McKewon, E. (2018). The impact of digital platforms on news and journalistic content. University of Technology.