Paying for privacy? Evaluating consumer willingness to pay for data ownership and ad-free social media experiences on Pinterest

Tyler J. Horan 1 *
More Detail
1 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 16, Issue 1, Article No: e202609. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17876
OPEN ACCESS   36 Views   12 Downloads   Published online: 06 Feb 2026
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

As social media platforms increasingly monetize user data through targeted advertising, critical questions arise about privacy rights, digital commodification, and platform governance. This study examines how Pinterest users conceptualize and value privacy, ad-free experiences, and alternative platform ownership models, including subscription-based and cooperative structures. Through mixed methods analysis of 1,000 Pinterest users’ responses, we investigate willingness to pay (WTP) for enhanced privacy protections and data sovereignty. Quantitative analysis reveals that revenue-sharing beliefs (β = 1.17, p < .001), privacy concerns (β = 0.29, p < .001), and income (β = 0.27, p < .001) significantly predict WTP, while age shows a negative association (β = -0.45, p < .001). Qualitative findings illuminate the mechanisms underlying these patterns, revealing tensions between users’ stated privacy concerns and their behavioral practices, extending scholarship on the privacy paradox. Although respondents demonstrate awareness of their uncompensated digital labor, structural barriers temper enthusiasm for alternative models. These results advance platform studies and digital sociology by illuminating the complex interplay between surveillance capitalism, user agency, and economic constraints. The study concludes by discussing practical implications for platform design, policy development, and future research on digital rights and platform sustainability.

CITATION

Horan, T. J. (2026). Paying for privacy? Evaluating consumer willingness to pay for data ownership and ad-free social media experiences on Pinterest. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(1), e202609. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17876

REFERENCES

  • Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765
  • Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. R., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442-492. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.442
  • Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big data, big questions: The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673-1689.
  • Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
  • Burgess, J., Marwick, A., Poell, T., & Gehl, R. W. (2018). Alternative social media: From critique to code. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 330-350). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n19
  • Carrascal, J. P., Riederer, C., Erramilli, V., Cherubini, M., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). Your browsing behavior for a big mac: Economics of personal information online. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 189-200). https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488406
  • Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
  • Draper, N. A., & Turow, J. (2019). The corporate cultivation of digital resignation. New Media & Society, 21(8), 1824-1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819833331
  • Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender and aspirational work in the social media economy. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300218176.001.0001
  • Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labor and imperialism. Monthly Review, 66(8), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-067-08-2016-01_2
  • Jarrett, K. (2014). Feminism, labour and digital media: The digital housewife. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315720111
  • Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
  • Mannan, M., & Schneider, N. (2021). Exit to community: Strategies for multi-stakeholder ownership in the platform economy. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 5(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nmyxp
  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
  • Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
  • Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.
  • Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
  • Staff, I. (2023). Would you pay for ad-free social media? A look at Meta & TikTok’s experiments. InsideHook. https://www.insidehook.com/internet/ad-free-social-media-facebook-instagram
  • Statista. (2025). Leading countries based on Pinterest audience size as of April 2024. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/328106/pinterest-penetration-markets/
  • van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.