Listen to What Doctors Say: Discursive Authority in Two Persian Medical Publications

Seyyed-Abdolhamid Mirhosseini 1 *
More Detail
1 Alzahra University, Iran
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 77-87.
OPEN ACCESS   1490 Views   918 Downloads   Published online: 15 Jan 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)


With a concern for social relations of power and authority and referring to the role of discourse in constructing and legitimating worldviews, perceptions, and practices, this study investigates particular instances of medical discourse in two distinct types of print medical media. Two sets of articles shape the overall bulk of data investigated in this research. The first set comprises 20 articles selected from Salamat medical journal which is a weekly publication aimed at the general non-expert public. The second body of data is shaped by 20 other articles appearing in Pezeshky-e Emrooz, a weekly publication specifically addressing medical practitioners. van Leeuwen’s (2008) conception of ‘the discursive construction of legitimation’ was adopted as the general guiding framework. His particular category of Expert authority – as the type of legitimation that is based on expertise which may be explicitly stated or may be taken for granted if the expert is recognized in a particular context – was used to code the data in search of themes that represent this kind of authority within the two categories of discourse. On this basis, varying degrees of legitimation appears to be practiced within the discourse of medical professionals in these two distinct discursive arenas.


Mirhosseini, S.-A. (2016). Listen to What Doctors Say: Discursive Authority in Two Persian Medical Publications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(1), 77-87.


  • Adolphs, S., Brown, B., Carter, R. Crawford, P. and Sahota, O. (2004). Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1): 9–28.
  • Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998). Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (2003). The discourse of medical encounters. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (Eds). The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 453– 469).Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Amouzadeh, M. (2002). Social realities in Persian advertising. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 12: 179–209.
  • Amouzadeh, M. (2003). Symbolic value of English language in Persian advertising. International Journal of Communication 13: 197–222.
  • Babaii, E. and Ansary, H. (2003). The discourse structure of and sociopolitical strictures on TV commercials. Asian EFL Journal, 5(3), September 2003. Retrieved October 22, 2004 from
  • Cordella, M. (2004). The dynamic consultation: A discourse analytical study of doctor– patient communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman. Fisher, S. and Todd, A. (Eds.). (1983). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Fisher, S. and Todd, A. (Eds.). (1993). The social organization of doctor-patient communication (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Gheitury, A. and Dehghan, M. (2005). Discourse and otherness: A critical study of the other in the recent discourse on democracy. Paper presented at International Conference on Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory into Research, University of Tasmania, Australia.
  • Gotti, M. and Salager-Meyer, F. (Eds.). (2006). Advances in medical discourse analysis: Oral and written contexts. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies 5(2): 235–263.
  • Jager, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak. & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32–62). London: Sage.
  • MacDonald, M. N. (2002). Pedagogy, pathology and ideology: The production, transmission and reproduction of medical discourse. Discourse and Society 13(4): 447–467.
  • Mirhosseini, S. A. & Fattahi, H. (2010). The language of ‘circule’: Discursive construction of false referral in Iranian teaching hospitals. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24(3), 304–325.
  • Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Mousavi, S. A. (2004). Critical discourse analysis: Relationships between ideology and textualization strategies. Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of Tabriz, Iran.
  • Shaw, S. E. and Greenhalgh, T. (2008). Best research – for what? Best health – for whom? A critical exploration of primary care research using discourse analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 66: 2506–2519.
  • Sultani, A. A. (2005). A discourse analysis of the socio-political changes of the Islamic revolution 1979-2003. Paper presented at the 9th International Pragmatics Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy.
  • van Dijk, T. (1995). Ideological discourse analysis. In E. Ventola & A. Solin (Eds.), New Courant, Special issue Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis (pp. 135– 161). English Department, University of Helsinki.
  • van Dijk, T. (2004). Ideology and discourse analysis. Oxford Symposium on Ideology. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from discourse%20analysis.htm
  • van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Waitzkin, H. (1989). A critical theory of medical discourse: Ideology, social control, and the processing of social context in medical encounters. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 30: 220–239.
  • Waitzkin, H. (1993). The politics of medical encounters: How patients and doctors deal with social problems. Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press.
  • Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts, and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage.