Innovation of a Smartphone App Design as Used in Face-To-Face Communication for the Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Chia-Ming Chang 1 *
More Detail
1 Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 5, Issue September 2015 - Special Issue, pp. 74-87. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5691
OPEN ACCESS   1275 Views   775 Downloads   Published online: 01 Sep 2015
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In recent years, our daily communication methods and behaviours have been transformed through new forms of communication media and technologies such as social media and smartphones. New communication technologies have opened new communication opportunities. On the other hand, communication is the main problem for Deaf/Hard of Hearing (D/HoH) people. Are new communication technologies able to address this problem? This study is a practice-based research project that aims to explore new communication opportunities for bridging the face-to-face communication gap between D/HoH and hearing people by developing a smartphone app. Creative practice (via interaction design) combined with ethnography (via interview) is the primary research method utilised in this study. The results of this study propose a solution, which is a smartphone application (app) that can be used to assist face-to-face communication between D/HoH and hearing people. This smartphone app provides an innovative way of using computer-mediated communication (CMC) in face-to-face communication; this allows conducting and incorporating physical interaction with nonverbal messages. In addition, it provides various ways of inputting messages that facilitate communication process and it provides a specific mode for the elderly.

CITATION

Chang, C.-M. (2015). Innovation of a Smartphone App Design as Used in Face-To-Face Communication for the Deaf/Hard of Hearing. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(September 2015 - Special Issue), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5691

REFERENCES

  • APPLE Inc., iOS Human Interface Guidelines [Online]. Available at https://developer.apple.com/library/iOS/documentation/userexperience/conceptual/mobilehig/ [23 June 2014]
  • BAILLY, G., RAIDT, S. and ELISEIl, F., 2010. Gaze, conversational agents and face-to-face communication. Speech Communication, 52 (6), 598-612.
  • BAYM, N.K., ZHANG, Y.B. and LIN, M.C., 2004. Social interactions across media. New Media & Society, 6 (3), 299.
  • BOUVET, D., 1990. The Path to Language: Bilingual Education for Deaf Children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • CHANG, C. M., 2014, New Media, New Technologies and New Communication Opportunities for Deaf/Hard of Hearing People. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Special Issue – October 2014, pp. 38-52. (ISSN: 1986-3497)
  • DOHEN, M., SCHWARTZ, J. and BAILLY, G., 2010. Speech and face-to-face communication–An introduction. Speech Communication, 52 (6), 477-480.
  • DOMINICK, J.R., 2009. The dynamics of mass communication: media in the digital age. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • GOGGIN, G., and HJORTH, L., 2009. Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunications to Media. New York: Routledge.
  • HARADA, S., SATO, D., TAKAGI, H. and ASAKAWA, C., 2013. Characteristics of Elderly User Behavior on Mobile Multi-touch Devices. In: Characteristics of Elderly User Behavior on Mobile Multi-touch Devices. Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2013. Springer, 2013, pp. 323-341.
  • JIANG, J., DAI, B., PENG, D., ZHU, C., LIU, L. and LU, C., 2012. Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32 (45), 16064-16069.
  • JIN, Z. X., PLOCHER, T. and KIFF, L., 2007. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. In: Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity. Springer, 2007, pp. 933-941.
  • KEATING, E., EDWARDS, T. and MIRUS, G., 2008. Cybersign and new proximities: Impacts of new communication technologies on space and language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (6), 1067-1081.
  • MEHRABIAN, A., 1972. Nonverbal communication. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • MORRIS, D., 2002. Peoplewatching: The Desmond Morris Guide to Body Language. London: Vintage.
  • OKDIE, B.M., GUADAGNO, R.E., BERNIERI, F.J., GEERS, A.L. and MCLARNEY-VESOTSKI, A.R., 2011. Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (1), 153-159.
  • PIERCE, T., 2009. Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (6), 1367-1372.
  • ROGERS, Y., SHARP, H. and PREECE, J., 2011. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley distributor.
  • SANDERS, E.B.N., 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, pp. 1-8.
  • TURKLE, S., 2012. Sherry Turkle: Connected, but alone? TED Talks [Online]. Available at http://www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_alone_together.html [Accessed 4 April 2012].
  • WEBB, W., 2010. Being mobile [smartphone revolution]. Engineering & Technology, 5 (15), 64-65.
  • WHITTAKER, S., and O'CONAILL, B., 1997. The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 23-49.