Group-Based Communication: Contents and Practices of WhatsApp Group Use by Generations and Genders

Abdullah Koçak 1 * , Öznur Yüksek Vergiveren 1
More Detail
1 Selçuk University, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 9, Issue 4, Article No: e201922.
OPEN ACCESS   2470 Views   2310 Downloads   Published online: 29 Aug 2019
Download Full Text (PDF)


Our time is called digital era with the effects of developing and varying communication technology rapidly. While adoption of smart phones has been occurred worldwide in the last decade, instant messaging applications (IM apps) have also been diffused synchronously and they have become a prominent tool for communication among people. Internet-based instant messaging applications provide users to share any content (texts, videos, photos, links, video and voice calls) at any time both for dyad and group messaging with the opportunities of being free of charge and user-friendly. Hence, people have embraced the new way of communication and SMS has been substituted by instant messaging in time. So, the scope of this study focuses on practices and contents of group-based communication within the sample of WhatsApp, which have a vast adoption in many countries. In this direction, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 633 individuals having a range of backgrounds in Turkey. First of all, 83.3% of participants describe WhatsApp as the most frequently used communication tool. Furthermore, 48.5% of the participants agree with the statement that ‘WhatsApp is indispensable’. In the context of contents, 73.6% of participants declare that the most frequently shared contents is about professional subjects both educational or business areas followed by personal issues and events (55.1%), chain-messages (caricatures, videos, photos, celebration messages) (52.2%) and gossips (44.5%). Considering the generations, while generation Z use WhatsApp groups for sharing personal issues, chain messages, cultural issues and gossip, generation X almost never use the application for this purposes. In terms of gender, it is understood that females tend to share personal issues and gossip more than males and males share political issues more than females. Finding of study confirms that WhatsApp groups are heavily used among Turkish users both for professional and personal life and it is accepted an essential communication way one cannot resist. Meantime purposes of usage differ by generations and genders.


Koçak, A., & Yüksek Vergiveren, Ö. (2019). Group-Based Communication: Contents and Practices of WhatsApp Group Use by Generations and Genders. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(4), e201922.


  • Aharony, N., & Gazit, T. (2016). The importance of the WhatsApp family group: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(2), 174-192.
  • Body, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
  • Church, K., & Oliveria, R. (2013). What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 352-361.
  • Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. (2018). Continued use of mobile instant messaging apps: A new perspective on theories of consumption, flow, and planned behavior. Social Sciences Computer Review, 1-23.
  • Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Available at: (Accessed: 5 February 2019)
  • Endeley, R. E. (2018). End-to-End Encryption in messaging services and national security – Case of WhatsApp messenger. Journal of Information Security, 9, 95-99.
  • Fernández-Robin, C., Yáñez, D., & McCoy, S. (2019). Intention to Use WhatsApp, Artificial Intelligence - Scope and Limitations, Dinesh G. Harkut, IntechOpen. Available at: (Accessed: 5 June 2019)
  • Gasaymeh, M. M. (2017). University students’ use of WhatsApp and their perception regarding its possible integration into their education. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 17(1), 1-10.
  • Gu, M., Shen, L., Gu, R., & Xu, B. (2012). Collaboration using instant messaging tool: a chat log analysis. World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, 1025-1030.
  • Jacinto, R. F., & Arnt, S. (2018). Prevalence of the use of mobile instant messaging applications: The need to assess their usage in human factors investigations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 406-410.
  • Knop, K., Öncü, S. J., Penzel, J., Abele, T. S., Brunner, T., Vorderer, P., & Wessler, H. (2015). Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging application and face-to-face interactions. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55, 1076-1084.
  • McCrindle, M. (2010). The A B C of X Y Z Understanding the Global Generations. A McCrindle Publications, Australia.
  • Nieradka, P. (2016). The use of mobile applications in the group of generations Y. Management, Knowledge and Learning Joint International Conference 2016, 811-819.
  • O’Hara, K., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW’14), Baltimore, MD, USA, 1131-1142.
  • Seufert, M., Hoßfeld, T., Schwind, A., Burger, V., & Tran-Gia, P. (2016). Analysis of group-based communication in WhatsApp. In International Conference Mobile Networks and Management, 536-541.
  • Statista (2017). Share of population in selected countries who are active WhatsApp users as of 3rd quarter 2017. Available at: (Accessed 4 February 2019)
  • Sultan, A. J. (2014). Addiction to mobile text messaging applications is nothing to ‘lol’ about. The Social Sciences Journal, 51, 57-69.
  • Swart, J., Chris, P., & Broersma, M. (2018). Shedding light on the dark social: The connective role of news and journalism in social media communities. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4329-4345.
  • Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2017). Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: a comparative analysis of Germany, Italy and the UK. Information, Communication and Society, 1-17.
  • Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. M. (2016). Permanently online – permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694-703.
  • Yus, F. (2017). Contextual constrains and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 66-86.