Gender Media Political Communicative Dominance: British Brexit Media Discussion

Tatyana A. Shiryaeva 1, Marina R. Zheltukhina 2 * , Yulia N. Ebzeeva 3, Luiza N. Gishkaeva 3, Yulia A. Kosova 3
More Detail
1 Department of English Language and Professional Communication, Pyatigorsk State University, Pyatigorsk, RUSSIA
2 Institute of Foreign Languages, Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University, Volgograd, RUSSIA
3 Department of Foreign Languages, Рeoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 12, Issue 4, Article No: e202230.
OPEN ACCESS   1031 Views   722 Downloads   Published online: 09 Sep 2022
Download Full Text (PDF)


The article is devoted to the study of British politicians' male and female speech behavior in the discussion of Brexit by various media. The necessity of gender peculiarities studies is determined by the extreme importance and specific role of the media discourse which defines the "agenda" and "mode of work" of the individual and of various social institutions in modern society, on the one hand, and rapidly growing research interests in gender manifestations in discourse, on the other hand. Institutionalization and ritualization form the basis of the gender manifestation of each personality by their belonging to a certain gender. Nowadays the discourse generation and usage cannot be studied outside of the gender factor. The purpose of this article is to identify and analyze the linguistic gender peculiarities of the British politicians' speech behavior in the political media communication. The article deals with the results of the morphological, semantic, and stylistic analysis of male and female speech behavior of British parliamentarians discussing different aspects of Brexit in the political media discourse in accordance with their gender origin. It was revealed that the frequency of abstract adjectives usage, complete absence of obscene vocabulary, invective words, general courtesy in constructing speeches, confident expression of own opinions, logical assessments of what is happening are the mail typical features of the female British parliamentarians’ speech behavior. While the British male parliamentarians do not care of certain lexical units and lexical-semantic fields selection and attitude creation in the discussion of Brexit problems among British electorate. Male politicians in their speeches prefer a wide range of different stylistic device.


Shiryaeva, T. A., Zheltukhina, M. R., Ebzeeva, Y. N., Gishkaeva, L. N., & Kosova, Y. A. (2022). Gender Media Political Communicative Dominance: British Brexit Media Discussion. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), e202230.


  • Buck, K. (2019). Speech on Brexit.
  • Corbyn, J. (2018). Speech on Britain After Brexit.
  • Ebzeeva, Yu. N., Naidenova, N. S., Gishkaeva, L. N., & Aleksandrova, O. I. (2017). Branding of armaments and innovative technologies of the defense-industrial complex of the Russian Federation as a new geopolitical strategy. Man in India, 97(23), 551-560.
  • Ebzeeva, Yu.N., & Karabulatova, I. S. (2017). Transcultural language personality: Statement of the problem and conceptual space. Man in India, 97(23), 255-262.
  • Gavrilova, M. V. (2013). Parliamentary discourse. Discourse Pi, 10(3), 113-115.
  • Ghafar Samar, R., & Alibakhshi, G. (2007). The gender linked differences in the use of linguistic strategies in face-to face communication. The Linguistics Journal, 3(3), 59-71.
  • Gishkaeva, L. N., Dubiniba, N. V., Moskvicheva, S. A., & Kriivoshlykova, L. V. (2018). The image of a modern woman in the advertising discourse: On the material of media texts of glossy magazines in Russia. Astra Salvensis, VI(12), 643-649.
  • Gorodnikova, M. D. (2002). Gender in communicative interaction. In Gender: language, culture, communication: Reports of the Second International Conference (pp. 70-76). Moscow State Linguistic University.
  • Gove, M. (2016). Speech on the EU.
  • Karpovskaya, N. V., Shiryaeva, O. V., & Zheltukhina, M. R. (2019). Stylistic means of headline creating in the information-analytical media text: pragmasemantic aspect of metaphor. XLinguae, 12(4), 173-182.
  • Lakoff, R. (1989). Language and woman's place. Longman Higher Education.
  • Lakoff, R. (2000). Language and place of the woman. Gender researches, 5, 241-254.
  • Lakoff, R. (2003). Language, gender, and politics: Putting “Women” and “Power” in the same sentence. In J. Holms & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 161-178). Blackwell.
  • Lakoff, R. T., & Bucholtz, M. (2004). Language and woman's place. Oxford University Press.
  • Lammy, D. (2018). Speech on Brexit.
  • Nordquist, R. (2019). Language and gender studies.
  • Polyakova, L. S. (2009). Concept "gender" of the linguistic description. Current Problems of Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 11, 44-49.
  • Prime Minister Theresa May gave a speech on Brexit in Stoke-on-Trent (2019).
  • Shiryaeva, T. A., & Avsharov, A. G. (2018). Socio-cognitive modeling as a methodological basis of business discourse analysis. Issues of Cognitive Linguitics, 1, 94-102.
  • Shiryaeva, T., Gelyaeva, A., Alikaev, R., Huchinaeva, D., & Toguzaeva, M. (2018). A theory-driven framework for the study of language in business. XLinguae, 11(1), 82-90.
  • Spelman, C. (2019). Speech on Brexit.
  • Tameryan, T. Y., Zheltukhina, M. R., Slyshkin, G. G., Abakumova, O. B., Volskaya, N. N., & Nikolaeva, A. V. (2018). Metaphor in political media discourse: Mental political leader portrait. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(4), 377-384.
  • Zelenskaya, L. L., Zubareva, T. T., Denisenko, V. N., Chervyakova, L. D., & Kosova, Y. A (2018). Verbal means of media manipulation with fears (on material of the American, English and Russian tabloid press). XLinguae, 11(3), 39-50.
  • Zheltukhina, M. R. (2014). Impact of a media discourse on the addressee. Peremena VGSPU.
  • Zheltukhina, M. R., Zelenskaya, L. L., & Ponomarenko, E. B. (2020). Indicating success with material symbols after the collapse of the USSR. Visual Anthropology, 33(2), 104-115.