Exploring Denial Strategies against Climate Change across Agents and Media Platforms

Isyaku Hassan 1, Rabiu Muazu Musa 2 * , Mohd Nazri Latiff Azmi 1, Mohamad Razali Abdullah 3, Adekunle Daoud Balogun 4
More Detail
1 Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, MALAYSIA
2 Centre for Fundamental and Continuing Education, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, MALAYSIA
3 East Coast Environmental Research Institute, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, MALAYSIA
4 Faculty of Law and International Relations, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, MALAYSIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 12, Issue 4, Article No: e202223. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12240
OPEN ACCESS   1636 Views   1041 Downloads   Published online: 19 Jul 2022
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Climate change represents a highly detrimental issue with long-term undesirable consequences on global humanity. Whilst concerted efforts are being made to curtail the effects of climate change, disinformation continues to be a significant obstacle to meaningful actions. Therefore, via content analysis, this study aims to explore the strategies employed by agents to deny the scientific evidence of climate change across media platforms. The data were gathered from a sample of two Malaysian online newspapers: The Star and New Straits Times. A total of 124 articles on climate change disinformation were gathered from the digital archives of the selected newspapers between August 2015 and October 2021 using “disinformation” and “climate change” as keywords. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test. The findings revealed that politicians, organizations, and anonymous agencies use more strategies to deny climate change compared with other agents such as academics, business tycoons, and celebrities. Additionally, social media, broadcast media, and online news represent the most frequently used platforms to deny climate change. These outcomes suggest the critical role of politics in sabotaging the efforts against climate change disinformation. This study could provide governments and activists with useful information to help mitigate disinformation against climate change.
Keywords: agents, climate change, denial strategies, disinformation, media effects

CITATION

Hassan, I., Musa, R. M., Azmi, M. N. L., Abdullah, M. R., & Balogun, A. D. (2022). Exploring Denial Strategies against Climate Change across Agents and Media Platforms. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), e202223. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12240

REFERENCES

  • Azmi, N. J., Omar, N. A. M., Zaid, S. B. M., Wahab, Z., & Yusof, A. (2015). Media portrayal on global climate change: An analysis of Malaysian mainstream newspapers. Studies in Media and Communication, 3(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v3i1.815
  • Bontcheva, K., Posetti, J., Teyssou, D., Meyer, T., Gregory, S., Hanot, C., & Maynard, D. (2020). Balancing act: Countering digital disinformation while respecting freedom of expression. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/1_introduction_17_35_balancing_act_disinfo.pdf
  • Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457-1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x
  • Cheng, H., & Gonzalez-Ramirez, J. (2021). Trust and the media: Perceptions of climate change news sources among US college students. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 910-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00163-y
  • Chung, D. S. (2008). Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00414.x
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  • Cummings, C. L., & Kong, W. Y. (2019). Breaking down “fake news”: Differences between misinformation, disinformation, rumors, and propaganda. In I. Linkov, L. Roslycky, & B. D. Trump (Eds.), Resilience and hybrid threats (pp. 188-204). IOS Press.
  • Green, L. W., Fielding, J. E., & Brownson, R. C. (2021). More on fake news, disinformation, and countering these with science. Annual Review of Public Health, 1(42), v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pu-42-012821-100001
  • Hassan, I., & Azmi, M. N. L. (2018). Readers’ preferences for print and online newspapers in Northwestern Nigeria (2018). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 965-974. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i6/4294
  • Hassan, I., Azmi, M. N. L., & Abdullahi, A. M. (2020a). Evaluating the spread of fake news and its detection. Techniques on social networking sites. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22(1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.1.289
  • Hassan, I., Musa, R. M., Azmi, M. N. L., Abdullah, M. R., Abdullah, A. T. H. (2020b). News reporting of injury prevalence in football: A study of selected Nigerian online newspapers (2020). Media Watch, 11(2), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2020/v11i2/195652
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (2004). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. In Political Psychology (pp. 139-149). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-7
  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Validity in content analysis. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/291/
  • Kuo, R., & Marwick, A. (2021). Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76
  • Lopez, A., & Share, J. (2020). Fake climate news: How denying climate change is the ultimate in fake news. http://www.susted.com/wordpress/april-2020-eco-media-literacy/
  • Loy, L. S., Hamann, K. R., & Reese, G. (2020). Navigating through the jungle of information. Informational self-efficacy predicts climate change-related media exposure, knowledge, and behavior. Climatic Change, 163(4), 2097-2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02918-9
  • Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2, 474-512.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  • Musa, R. M., Hassan, I., Abdullah, M. R., Azmi, M. N. L., Abdul Majeed, A., & Abu Osman, N. A. (2021). Surveillance of injury types, locations, and intensities in male and female tennis players: A content analysis of online newspaper reports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312686
  • Oleinik, A. (2011). Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: Triangulation at work. Quality & Quantity, 45(4), 859-873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9399-4
  • Ong, J. C., & Cabanes, J. V. A. (2018). Architects of networked disinformation: Behind the scenes of troll accounts and fake news production in the Philippines. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/communication_faculty_pubs/74/
  • Pogson, M. (2021). Climate disinformation adverts: Real-world indicators of an online problem. Academia Letters, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL512
  • Schafer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.191
  • Shu, K., Bhattacharjee, A., Alatawi, F., Nazer, T. H., Ding, K., Karami, M., & Liu, H. (2020). Combating disinformation in a social media age. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(6), e1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1385
  • Strudwicke, I. J., & Grant, W. J. (2020). #JunkScience: Investigating pseudoscience disinformation in the Russian Internet Research Agency tweets. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520935071
  • Taylor, S., & Johnston, G. (2020). ENSC 162: Real news, fake news: Media’s Influence on the public’s opinion of climate change. https://digitalcommons.longwood.edu/spring_showcase/2020/honorscollege/24/
  • Van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008
  • Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Thinking about ‘information disorder’: formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information. In C. Ireton, & J. Posetti (Eds.), Journalism, ‘fake news’ & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training (pp. 43-54). UNESCO Publishing.
  • Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x