Examining “replacement” attitudes in the context of uses and gratifications during the 8-day Instagram inaccessibility period in Turkey

Levent Özkoçak 1 * , Yavuz Tuna 1
More Detail
1 Anadolu University, Eskisehir, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 15, Issue 3, Article No: e202521. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16526
OPEN ACCESS   55 Views   33 Downloads   Published online: 21 Jun 2025
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The uses and gratifications theory argues that individuals attain specific satisfactions through their engagement with the media. The hypothesis posits that individuals fulfill their pleasure demands by selecting amongst various media tools and their offerings. The concept, originating from research on mass media utilization, has been revised considering technological advancements and the proliferation of media instruments. Due to the diversity encountered in social media tools, communication experts have examined the notion of uses and gratifications with greater specificity. Users’ gratifications are attained through social media in contemporary society. The established mentality, along with the access prohibition on a widely utilized social media platform (Instagram), have prevented users from fulfilling their gratifications. The access prohibition on Instagram in Turkey from August 2 to August 8, 2024, serves as the most notable example of this phenomenon. This study seeks to identify the social media platform via which users fulfill gratifications that were unattainable during the enforced access ban on a specific social media tool. To elucidate these attitudes termed “replacement,” it was first ascertained which satisfaction was lacking, followed by identifying the social media instrument employed to attain the unmet satisfaction. The findings and analyses of the in-person survey conducted with 463 individuals were disseminated, reflecting the Turkish population through quantitative research methodologies. Efforts were made to ensure that the scale employed acknowledged the reality of digital marketing. It was concluded that no money losses and hence no financial gratifications transpired throughout the access prohibition.
Keywords: uses and gratifications, replacement, social media, generations, digital marketing

CITATION

Özkoçak, L., & Tuna, Y. (2025). Examining “replacement” attitudes in the context of uses and gratifications during the 8-day Instagram inaccessibility period in Turkey. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(3), e202521. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16526

REFERENCES

  • Alikılıç, Ö. A. (2011). Public relations 2.0 new stakeholders, new techniques in social media. Efil Yayın Evi.
  • Ayhan, B., & Çavuş, S. (2014). Shifts in audience research: From uses and gratifications to addiction. Selçuk Journal of Communication, 8(2), 32–60.
  • Ayhün, E. S. (2013). Differences between generations and organizational effects. Journal of Economics and Management Research, 2(1).
  • Bal, H. (2018). Sociology of communication. Sentez.
  • Baran, G. A. (1997). Sociology of communication. Afşar Publications.
  • Başhan, E. (2018). Analyzing information and mass media through interactive documentaries. S. Gezgin (Ed.), Communication in the digital age. Eğitim.
  • Bawack, E., Bonhoure, E., Kamdjoug, J. K., & Giannakis, M. (2023). How social media live streams affect online buyers: A uses and gratifications perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 70, Article 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102621
  • Biçer, S., & Şener, Y. (2020). YouTube usage habits of university students in the context of uses and gratifications approach. Selçuk Journal of Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.7456/ctc_2019_02
  • Bucknell Bossen, C., & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186
  • Buf, D., & Stefanita, O. (2020). Uses and gratifications of YouTube: A comparative analysis of users and content creators. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.2.301
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: Basic concepts and use in scale development. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 32, 470–483.
  • Chamberlain, M. A. (1994). New technologies in health communication: Progress or panacea?. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294038002008
  • Charney, T. R. (1996). Uses and gratifications of the Internet [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Michigan State University.
  • Çobanoğlu, E., & Dirsehan, T. (2017). An empirical investigation into the determinants of various social networking sites used by generation Y consumers. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 12(47), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.v12i27581.290490
  • Deng, T., Vargas-Bianchi, L., & Mensa, M. (2024). Cross-cultural comparison of TikTok uses and gratifications. Behavior & Information Technology, 43(12). 3047–3059. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2270534
  • Falgoust, G., Winterlind. E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow. H., & Madathil, K. C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult’s participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2, Article 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014
  • Ferris, A. L., Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Sommer, P. A. (2021). Applying the uses and gratifications model to examine consequences of social media addiction. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019003
  • Gere, C. (2018). Digital culture. Salon.
  • Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.305
  • Haydarlı, M., M., Canbek, L., Küçük, Z., & Akalın, N. (2016). Quantitative research. Sedatsen. https://sedatsen.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/bc3b6lc3bcm-5-1.pdf
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
  • Kahraman, N. (2019). An analysis of the post graduate studies in communication field upon usage and satisfaction approach. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, (48), 98–120.
  • Kara, T. (2016). Why do young people use Snapchat? A research based on the uses and gratifications approach. Intermedia International E-Journal, 3(5), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.21645/intermedia.2017.14
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973-1974). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson T.J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4
  • Kılıç, Ö. A., Gülay, G., & Sevtap, B. (2013). ‘Analysis of Facebook applications within the framework of uses and gratifications theory: A study on Yaşar University students’. Gazi University Faculty of Communication, Journal of Communication Theory and Research, 37, 41–67.
  • Kutup, N. (2010). İnternet ve sanat, yeni medya ve net.art [Internet and art, new media and net.art]. In M. Akgül, A. Özgit, E. Derman, T. Yılmaz, & U. Çağlayan (Eds.), Akademik Bilişim 2010: XII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı (pp. 9–20). https://ab.org.tr/ab10/bildiri/56.doc
  • McQuail, D. (1984). With the benefit of hindsight: Reflections on uses and gratifications research. Critical Studies in Mass Media Communication, 1(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360028
  • McQuail, D. (2011). Mass communication theory (6th Ed.). Sage Publications.
  • McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1997). Mass communication models. İmge Kitapevi.
  • Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13–46. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
  • Netchitailova, E. (2018). The flaneur, the idle and the empathic worker. New Media Theories.
  • Papacharissi Z., & Rubin A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  • Pelletier, M. J., Krallman, A., Adams, F. G., & Hancock, T. (2020). One size doesn’t fit all: A uses and gratifications analysis of social media platforms. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-10-2019-0159
  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
  • Rafaeli, S. (1986), The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium. Social Science Micro Review, 2(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443938600200302
  • Rubin, A. M. (1977). Television usage, attitudes and viewing behaviors of children and adolescents. Journal of Broadcasting, 21(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157709363844
  • Rubin, A. M. (1979). Television use by children and adolescents. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00626.x
  • Rubin, A. M. (1981, August 8–11). The interactions of television uses and gratifications [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, East Lansing, MI, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED205953.pdf
  • Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158309386471
  • Ruggiero E. T. (2009). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
  • Rustemi, V., Hasani, E., Jusufi, G., & Mladenović, D. (2021). Social media in use: A uses and gratifications approach. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 26(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.26.1.12
  • Sheldon, P., Antony, M. G., & Ware, L. J. (2021). Baby boomers’ use of Facebook and Instagram: Uses and gratifications theory and contextual age indicators. Heliyon, 7, Article e06670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06670
  • Walker, J. R., & Bellamy, R. V. (1991). Gratifications of grazing: Exploratory study of remote-control use. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909106800313
  • Yayla, H. M. (2018). Social media usage of Dokuz Eylül University faculty of fine arts students in the context of uses and gratifications: Instagram example. Selçuk Journal of Communication, 11(1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.346756
  • Yaylagül, L. (2013). Mass communication theories. Dipnot Publications.
  • Yazıcı, F. (2020). Accuracy of information and fake news in the digital age. In H. Aydın, & F. Yazıcı (Eds.), Popular digital issues in the new media age. Nobel.
  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS applied scientific research methods. Detay Publications.
  • Yeniçıktı, N. T. (2016). Social media usage motivations: Uses and gratifications research on Facebook and Twitter users [Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk University].
  • Yıldırım, Ş., Özdemir, M., & Alparslan, E., (2018). A social network analysis within the framework of the uses and gratifications theory: Facebook example. Intermedia International Peer-Reviewed E-Journal of Communication Sciences, 5(8), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.21645/intermedia.2018.44
  • Zhang, L., & Zhang, W. (2013). Real-time Internet news browsing: Information vs. experience-related gratifications and behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2712–2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.009