Determining Gender Stereotype based on Physical Appearance Expectations in Interpersonal Communication Process: An Intercultural Comparison between Turkey and Portugal

Derya Gul Unlu 1 *
More Detail
1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Communication Public Relations and Publicity Department, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 11, Issue 1, Article No: e202102.
OPEN ACCESS   2506 Views   4043 Downloads   Published online: 16 Jan 2021
Download Full Text (PDF)


While making inferences about the physical appearance of other persons, the individual makes use of various stereotypes, and according to these stereotypes, categorizes the new individual based on his/her physical appearance. This affects the interpersonal communication process established, and the individual starts and maintains the communication process according to the stereotypes about other persons categorised in the mind. In this regard, it can be suggested that gender stereotypes, which are based on the physical appearance of the individual, are determinant on the content and quality of interpersonal communication. In this context, determining these stereotype-based expectations is of great importance also for reducing communication barriers encountered in interpersonal communication. Based on this focus, the research aims to reveal the physical appearance features of the other person, which the individual pays attention to most, at the start of and during the interpersonal communication process, and whether this attitude differs according to the gender of the evaluating or evaluated individual. Conducted in accordance with this aim, the study is a descriptive method-based field research implemented by means of open-ended question form. The study also aims to present an intercultural perspective; within this scope, findings obtained from the statements of Turkish and Portugese respondents are provided in a comparative manner. The primary result of the study is the fact that both physical appearance features, which the individual first evaluates in the moment of first meeting and during the interpersonal communication process, differ according to the gender and cultural background of the evaluating individual.


Gul Unlu, D. (2021). Determining Gender Stereotype based on Physical Appearance Expectations in Interpersonal Communication Process: An Intercultural Comparison between Turkey and Portugal. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(1), e202102.


  • Akkoyun, F. (1983). Kişiliğin projektif testlerle değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 397-408.
  • Barbera, E. (2003). Gender schemas: Configuration and activation process. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 35(5), 176-184.
  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Detecting and experiencing prejudice: New answers to old questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 139-219.
  • Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. C., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 480-500.
  • Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (2000). Can item format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in mathematics achievement?. Sex Roles, 42(1-2), 1-21.
  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364.$00.75
  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 165-172.
  • Bennet, M., Sani, F., Hopkins, N., Agostini, L., & MAlucchi, L. (2000). Children’s gender categorization of automatic processing, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 97-102.
  • Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a Babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 312-323.
  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544-557.
  • Buffington, C., Cerf, B., Jones, C., & Weinberg, B. A. (2016). STEM training and early career outcomes of female and male graduate students: Evidence from UMETRICS data linked to the 2010 census. American Economic Review, 106(5), 333-338.
  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S., Raymond, D. B., Clarkson, F. M., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-78.
  • Byres, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
  • Cadinu, M., Latrofa, M., & Carnaghi, A. (2011). Comparing self-stereotyping and out-group-stereotyping and out-group-stereotyping in unequal-status groups: The case of gender. Self and Identity, 12(6), 582-596.
  • Cash, T. F., & Brown, T. A. (1989). Gender and body images: Stereotypes and realities. Sex Roles, 21(5/6), 361-373.
  • Cash, T. F., Winstead, B. A., & Janda, L. H. (1986). Body image survey report: The great American shape-up. Psychology Today, 20(4), 30-44.
  • Cash, T. F., & Kilcullen, R. (1985). The eye of the beholder: Susceptibility to sexism and beutyism in evaluation of managerial applications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 591-605.
  • Cash, T. F., Rissi, J., & Chapman, R. (1985). Not just another pretty face: Sex roles, locus of control, and cosmetic use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 246-257.
  • Cashdan, E. (1998). Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(4), 209-228.
  • Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 540-551.
  • de Lemus, S., Spears, R., & Moya, M. (2012). The power of smile to move you: Complementary submissiveness in women’s posture as a function of gender salience and facial experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1480-1494.
  • de Lemus, S., Spears, R., Bukowski, M., Moya, M. & Lupianez, J. (2013). Reversing implicit gender stereotype activation as a function of exposure to traditional gender roles. Social Psychology, 44(2), 109-116.
  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1993). Gender Stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theory (pp. 107-139). Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1985). Gender stereotypes: Some thoughts on the cognitive organization of gender-related information. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 123-144.
  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991-1004.
  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender in the context: An interactive model of gender related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369-389.
  • Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L.L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3(2), 145-167.
  • Dion, K. K., Pak, A. W. P., & Dion, K. L. (1990). Stereotyping physical attractiveness: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 158-179.
  • Dökmen, Z. (2012). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar. Istanbul: Remzi Kitapevi.
  • Ellemers, N. (2017). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.
  • Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet kültürü içerisinde kadın ve erkek kimliği (Malatya örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 209-230.
  • Freeman, H. R. (1987). Structure and content of gender stereotypes: Effects of somatic appearance and trait information. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(1), 59-68.
  • Friedrickson, B., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Pyschology Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206.
  • Grunspan, D. Z., Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Wiggins, B. L., Crowe, A. J., & Goodreau, S. M. (2016). Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PloS One, 11(2), e0148405.
  • Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 221-242.
  • Gül-Ünlü, D. (2019). Kişilerarası iletişim sürecinde toplumsal cinsiyet kimliği kalıpyargılarının belirlenmesi: İletişim kaynağının beden dili üzerinden bir inceleme [Determining gender identity stereotypes in the process of interpersonal communication: An investigation through the body language of the source]. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi-Erciyes Communication Magazine, 6(1), 243-262.
  • Gül-Ünlü, D. (2018). Kişilerarası iletişim sürecinde toplumsal cinsiyet kimliğine ilişkin kalıpyargıların belirlenmesi [Identifying stereotypes regarding gender identity in the process of interpersonal communication]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Istanbul University.
  • Gürüz, D., & Eğinli, A.T. (2011). Kişilerarası İletişim Bilgiler-Etkiler-Engeller [Interpersonal Communication Information-Effects-Barriers]. Istanbul: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Heflick, N., Goldenberg, J., Cooper, D., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appereance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality, and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 572-581.
  • Hofstede, G. (1996). Gender stereotypes and partner preferences of Asian women in masculine and feminine cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(5), 533-546.
  • Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortial measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616-626.
  • Jackson, L. A., & Ervin, K. S. (2001). Height stereotypes of women and men: The liabilities of shortness and for both sexes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(4), 433-445.
  • Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., & Rostker, R. (1988). Gender, gender role, and body image. Sex Roles, 19(7/8), 429-443.
  • Jackson, L. A., & Cash, T. F. (1985). Components of gender stereotypes and their implications for inferences on stereotypic and nonstereotypic dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 326-344.
  • Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., & Hymes, J. (1987). Gender, gender role and physical appearance. Journal of Psychology, 121(1), 51-56.
  • Joshi, A., Son, J., & Roh, H. (2015). When can women close the gap? A meta-analysis test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1516-1545.
  • Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In M.A. Paludi (Ed.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories (pp. 205-236). New York, NY: Prager Publication.
  • MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A.N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in students ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291-303.
  • Marsh, R., Cook, G., & Hicks, J. (2006). Gender and orientation stereotypes bias soırce-monitoring attributions. Memory, 142(2), 148-160.
  • Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16(3-5), 437-458.
  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). Gender differences in responding to open-ended problem-solving questions. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(4), 355-364.
  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269-281.
  • Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1751-1761.
  • Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32(3), 287-295.
  • Spaniol, J., & Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 631-651.
  • Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, B. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51(11-12), 631-645.
  • Shaffer, D. R., Crepaz, N., & Sun, C. R. (2000). Physical attractiveness stereotyping and differences between Americans and Taiwanese. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31(5), 557-582.
  • Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24(1-2), 57-71.
  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relationship to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29-39.
  • Stake, J., & Lauer, M.L. (1987). The consequences of being overweight: A controlled study of gender differences. Sex Roles, 17(1-2), 31-47.
  • Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(10), 805-818.
  • Trevino, L. J., Gomez-Meja, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Mixon, F. G. (2015). Meritocracies or masculinities? The differential allocation of named professorships by gender in the academy. Journal of Management, 44(3), 972-1000.
  • Wallston, B. S., & O’Leary, V. E. (1981). Sex and gender make a difference: The differential perceptions of women and men. In. L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 9-41). Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
  • Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40(7-8), 513-525.
  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Thirty-Nation Study. California: Sage Publication.