Designing a Model of Acceptance New Media Technologies (Media Convergence Emphasis)

Babak Rahnavard 1 *, Kamran Mohamad Khani 1, Aliakbr Farhanghi 1, Amir Hossein Mohammad Davoudi 1
More Detail
1 Islamic Azad University, Iran
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 43-60.
OPEN ACCESS   1924 Views   2875 Downloads   Published online: 10 Oct 2017
Download Full Text (PDF)


This research methodology is applied research(descriptive) and data collection methods implemented with mix method (qualitative and quantitative),at first stage, researcher reviewed a literature in media technology transfer to identification effective components and indicators, at qualitative part of the research, Selected 10 media industry experts to interviewed for identify effective indicators, in quantitative research part, researcher made questionnaire was distributed in the statistical sample of 300 responder from the population of the study and 285 questionnaires were returned. After analyzing, questionnaire responses with Spss software, Cronbach's alpha coefficient (reliability) was obtained α=0.881 and finally using structural equation modeling (SEM), to designing a model of acceptance new media technologies, evaluation of the model show an absolute fit index (root mean square error 0.094 and chi-square 0.00), Incremental Fitness index of 0.886 and Frugal Fitness index 3.48, which indicates the acceptability.


Rahnavard, B., Khani, K. M., Farhanghi, A., & Davoudi, A. H. M. (2017). Designing a Model of Acceptance New Media Technologies (Media Convergence Emphasis). Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 43-60.


  • Albarran,A; Chan-Olmsted,M, and Michael, O. (2006). Handbook of media Management and Economics, London, L.Erlbaum Association.
  • Alrafi, A. (2006). Technology Acceptance Model Retrieved 4th February 2009, from
  • Ajzen,I.; Fishbein,M .(2002).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice- hall, englewoodcliffs.
  • Aris, A.; Bughin, J. (2005). Managing Media Companies Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value, England, Wiley Publications.
  • Atkin,D.; Hunt,D, Carolyn, A. (2015). Diffusion Theory in the New Media Environment: Toward an Integrated Technology Adoption Model, Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 623-650.
  • Babaei, M. (2012). Digital Media: participatory and technology-based, Monthly journal discourse of Science and Technology, 1(2), 5-22. (In Persian)
  • Brown, T. E.; Davidsson, P., &Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevenson’s nceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 953–968.
  • Chen, L., Gillenson, M. L., Sherrell, D. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information& Management, 39(8), 705–719.
  • Chuttur, Mohammad. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions, Indiana University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).
  • Dailey, L.; Demo, L. Spillman, M. (2003). The convergence continuum: a model for studying collaboration between media newsrooms.
  • Farhanghi, A.; et al. (2009). Design interaction models and new technologies of information and communication Media Management, Journal of Communication researches, 16( 4),11-36 .(In Persian)
  • Hanson, Jarice; Narula, Uma. (2011). New communication technologies in the developing countries. ( Heidari, Davod) Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Jenkins, H.; Deuze, M. (2008). Editorial: Convergence Culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 5–12.
  • Klinenberg, E. (2005). Convergence: News production in a digital age. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 48-64.
  • Kolodzy, J. (2006). Convergence journalism: Writing and reporting across the news media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Khojasteh, H.; et al. (2012). Models comply with media technology. The Quarterly Journal of Media Scientific, 24(3), 5-22. (In Persian)
  • Lin, C. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Journal Communication Theory, 13(4), 345–365.
  • Lin, C. (2009). Exploring the online radio adoption decision-making process: Cognition, attitude, and technological fluidity. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 884–899.
  • Napoli, P. (2008). Towards a model of audience evolution: New technology and the transformation of media audience. New York, Paperwork. The Donald McGannon Communication Research Centre.
  • Phillips, J. (2014). Examining Predictors of U.S. Student Intent to Study Abroad from a Communication Perspective. Open Access Dissertations, Paper 1346.
  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th Edition). The Free Press, New York, USA. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
  • Renaud, Karen; Biljon, Judy. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the Eldry: a Qualitative study, SAICSIT 08, South Africa.
  • Roshandel, T.; et al. (2011). Effects of convergence on print news media management, case study Citizen Newspaper, Public Administration, 3(8), 39-56 .(In Persian)
  • Saryazdi, A.; et al. (2011). Analyzed the impact of technology on organizational behavior using system dynamics approach, 1th International Conference on Technology Management, Tehran, Iran.(In Persian)
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D. and Davis, G.B. (2003), User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Zhang, Sheng. (2012). the convergence of conventional media and new technology, the case of the New York time broadcastion, p293.