Age Differences in Online Communication: How College Students and Adults Compare in Their Perceptions of Offensive Facebook Posts

Loreen Wolfer 1

More Detail


Abstract

With the most recent US Presidential election, civility in online communication hasresurfaced as a social issue. Asurvey of 409 college students and 190 faculty / staff at a liberal arts college in northeastern Pennsylvania used open-ended questions to identifythe typesof communicative posts people of different ages have seen and considered offensive on Facebook. Content analysisidentified twenty unique themes of online inappropriateness, many of whichare similar across age groups butdo not appear in previous research. Common topthemesincluderacist comments, sex / nudity, political references, and offending visuals. Age differences emerge in the rankings of these four themes and in the identified fifth theme, which is “other social issues” among college students and foul language for adults. Findings also indicate that students were statistically more likely than adults to consider posts involving traditional social issues (racism, sexism, LGBT issues, and alcohol / drugs) or aggression to be offensive; and, adults were more likely to consider foul language or the discussion of politics or religion to be offensive. Symbolic interaction theory is used to link perceptions of offensive posts to judgments of others, and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Keywords

Content analysis Facebook college students adults inappropriate communication

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2608

Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 24-42

Published Online: 10 Oct 2017

Article Views: 353

Article Downloads: 147

Open Access References How to Cite This Article