The Role of Media in Peaceful Resolution of Civil Wars: The Case of Tajikistan from the Point of Peace Communication

Behruz Raisov 1, Ali Simsek 1 *
More Detail
1 Anadolu University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 215-236. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2652
OPEN ACCESS   2449 Views   1656 Downloads   Published online: 16 Jul 2018
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The role of the media in conflicts has recently gained importance due to the fact that civil wars have taken place in various parts of the world. This role can either be positive or negative. Therefore, it is important to investigate how media outlets have been used during conflict situations in countries where civil wars have occurred. In light of the background information regarding Northern Ireland, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Ruanda and Sierra Leone, the case of Tajikistan civil war was explored in this study from a peace communication perspective. Content analysis, interviews and document analysis techniques were used to collect data. In particular, newspaper coverage, brochures, and radio broadcasts during the civil war were analyzed. The results show that the Tajikistan civil war started in the context of weak socio-political climate, visible influence of foreign countries, and a loss of long-exercised control over media through the state apparatus. Before the war media caused increasing tension in the society but the role of media has changed during the peace talks.  Significant work has been done to end the civil war in Tajikistan in terms of all aspects of peace communication. The media generally played a vital role in promoting peace among people and encouraging the fighting parties to reach a consensus. In general, both the pro-government and pro-opposition media acted toward the direction of making peace. In particular, the pro-government newspapers Jumhuriyat and Sadoi Mardum reflected a peaceful view on behalf of the official government. The radio program Khoki Vatan (Homeland), which was created and broadcasted by the Radio of Tajikistan, also played a major role in promoting peace.
 

CITATION

Raisov, B., & Simsek, A. (2018). The Role of Media in Peaceful Resolution of Civil Wars: The Case of Tajikistan from the Point of Peace Communication. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(3), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2652

REFERENCES

  • Abdulloev, I. (2013). UN and conflict between Tajiks: The peaceful role of UN in dialog between Tajiks. Nomai Donishgoh, 1, 100-109
  • Archick, K. (2015). Northern Ireland: The peace process. Congressional Research Service. p.23 . Retrieved October 23, 2017 fom file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/3657.pdf
  • Batware, B. (15.01.2012). Ruandan ethnic conflicts: A historical look at root causes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Peace and Conflicts Studies, European Peace University, Austria.
  • BBC. (14 May 2013). Hoci Akbar Turaconzoda. Retrieved March 24, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yynzmNUcRII.
  • Bobokhonov, R.S. (2011). Civil war in Tajikistan (1992-1997 years): Causes, process, results and lessons. Social Science and Modernity, 4, 74-83
  • Buşkov, V.I., Mikulskiy, D.V. (1996). The anatomy of civil war in Tajikistan (Ethno-political process and political struggles, 1992-1995). Moscow: Russian-based Research Foundation. Retrieved January 20, 2017 from http://www.cac.org/datarus/st_08_bush. shtml.
  • Faroughi, P. (2002). Tajikistan: Nationalism, ethnicity, conflict, and socio-economic disparities – Sources and solutions. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 22(1), 39-61
  • Hamad, S. (2013). How “Sadoi Mujohid (The voice of mujahid)” become the messenger of peace. Ruzgor. Retrieved April 5, 2017 from http://ruzgor.tj/sulh-oshti-vahdat/9471-chi-tavr-sadoi-mujohid-qosidi-sulh-shud-3302.html.
  • Hocazod, S. (2014). Barış ve birlik elçisi. Jumhuriyat. No: 70, S.3. Dushanbe.
  • Imomov, A., Sanders, G., Çufrin, G. (2014). The Inter-Tajiks dialogue within the framework of Dartmouth conference. Retrieved June 21, 2017 from http://www.cac.org/datarus/st_ 03_imomov.shtml.
  • Hoffmann, J. (2013). Conceptualizing ‘communication for peace. UPEACE open knowledge network occasional papers. San Jose, Costa Rica: University of Peace.
  • Kabanda, M. (2007). Kanguare: The triumph of propaganda redefined. In A. Thompson (Ed.), The media and the Rwanda genocide (pp. 62-72). London: Pluto.
  • Kimani, M. (2007). RTLM: The medium that became a tool for mass murder (Statement by Kofi Annan). In A. Thompson (Ed.), The media and the Rwanda genocide (pp.110-124). London: Pluto Press.
  • Li, D. (2007). Echoes of violence: Considerations on radio and genocide in Ruanda. In A Thompson (Ed.), The media and the Rwanda genocide (pp. 90-109). London: Pluto.
  • Murodov, S. (2015). The role of mediator institutions in social and political conflicts. Dushanbe. Tajikistan: State University of Pedagogy.
  • Panfilov, O. (2003). Tajikistan: Journalists during the civil war (1992-1997). Prava Cheloveka, Moscow.
  • Rahmon, E. (2011). Independence of Tajikistan and revival of nation. Irfon, p.576
  • Saunders, H.H. (2001). The Inter-Tajik dialogue (A public peace process: Sustained dialogue to transform racial and ethnic conflicts. New York: Palgrave.
  • Schmitz, A. (2015). Islam in Tajikistan: Actors, discourses, conflicts. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
  • Sharafieva, O.K. (2013). (Ed.). Negotiations between Tajiks as a sample for resolving civil wars (pp.84-91). State University of Tomsk (Publication No 367).
  • Wolsfed, G. (2004). Media and the path to peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yusufjonova, Z. (2005). Peacebuilding in Tajikistan. Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame. Retrieved July 2, 2017 from http://www.beyond intractability.org/casestudy/yusufjonova-peacebuilding.